You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
X Demographics
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
| Title |
Brokering Bureaucrats: How Bureaucrats and Civil Society Facilitate Clientelism Where Parties are Weak
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Comparative Political Studies, August 2022
|
| DOI | 10.1177/00104140221115171 |
| Authors |
Agnes Cornell, Marcia Grimes |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 85 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| United States | 5 | 6% |
| Mexico | 4 | 5% |
| Sweden | 3 | 4% |
| Peru | 3 | 4% |
| Brazil | 3 | 4% |
| Canada | 3 | 4% |
| Colombia | 2 | 2% |
| Norway | 2 | 2% |
| United Kingdom | 2 | 2% |
| Other | 13 | 15% |
| Unknown | 45 | 53% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Members of the public | 41 | 48% |
| Scientists | 40 | 47% |
| Practitioners (doctors, other healthcare professionals) | 3 | 4% |
| Science communicators (journalists, bloggers, editors) | 1 | 1% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 22 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Unknown | 22 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 6 | 27% |
| Lecturer | 3 | 14% |
| Professor | 2 | 9% |
| Unspecified | 2 | 9% |
| Student > Master | 2 | 9% |
| Other | 2 | 9% |
| Unknown | 5 | 23% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Social Sciences | 10 | 45% |
| Business, Management and Accounting | 2 | 9% |
| Unspecified | 2 | 9% |
| Economics, Econometrics and Finance | 1 | 5% |
| Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 1 | 5% |
| Other | 0 | 0% |
| Unknown | 6 | 27% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 52. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 17 April 2023.
All research outputs
#836,530
of 25,793,330 outputs
Outputs from Comparative Political Studies
#130
of 1,275 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#19,434
of 434,346 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Comparative Political Studies
#2
of 13 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,793,330 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 96th percentile: it's in the top 5% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 1,275 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 20.4. This one has done well, scoring higher than 89% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 434,346 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 95% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 13 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done well, scoring higher than 84% of its contemporaries.