You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
X Demographics
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
| Title |
Comparative analyses of longevity and senescence reveal variable survival benefits of living in zoos across mammals
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Scientific Reports, November 2016
|
| DOI | 10.1038/srep36361 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Morgane Tidière, Jean-Michel Gaillard, Vérane Berger, Dennis W. H. Müller, Laurie Bingaman Lackey, Olivier Gimenez, Marcus Clauss, Jean-François Lemaître |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 82 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| United Kingdom | 6 | 7% |
| United States | 5 | 6% |
| Japan | 5 | 6% |
| Canada | 5 | 6% |
| Germany | 4 | 5% |
| Australia | 3 | 4% |
| France | 2 | 2% |
| Montenegro | 1 | 1% |
| Sweden | 1 | 1% |
| Other | 4 | 5% |
| Unknown | 46 | 56% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Members of the public | 70 | 85% |
| Scientists | 9 | 11% |
| Practitioners (doctors, other healthcare professionals) | 2 | 2% |
| Science communicators (journalists, bloggers, editors) | 1 | 1% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 224 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Netherlands | 1 | <1% |
| Russia | 1 | <1% |
| South Africa | 1 | <1% |
| Unknown | 221 | 99% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Student > Bachelor | 38 | 17% |
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 34 | 15% |
| Student > Master | 32 | 14% |
| Researcher | 31 | 14% |
| Student > Doctoral Student | 7 | 3% |
| Other | 28 | 13% |
| Unknown | 54 | 24% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 83 | 37% |
| Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology | 18 | 8% |
| Environmental Science | 18 | 8% |
| Veterinary Science and Veterinary Medicine | 16 | 7% |
| Medicine and Dentistry | 7 | 3% |
| Other | 24 | 11% |
| Unknown | 58 | 26% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 205. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 18 April 2024.
All research outputs
#196,346
of 25,850,376 outputs
Outputs from Scientific Reports
#2,361
of 143,462 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#3,790
of 319,840 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Scientific Reports
#56
of 3,668 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,850,376 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 99th percentile: it's in the top 5% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 143,462 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 18.8. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 98% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 319,840 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 98% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 3,668 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 98% of its contemporaries.