↓ Skip to main content

Biomimetic polymers in pharmaceutical and biomedical sciences

Overview of attention for article published in European Journal of Pharmaceutics & Biopharmaceutics, September 2004
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Good Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (67th percentile)

Mentioned by

patent
3 patents
video
1 YouTube creator

Citations

dimensions_citation
167 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
183 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Biomimetic polymers in pharmaceutical and biomedical sciences
Published in
European Journal of Pharmaceutics & Biopharmaceutics, September 2004
DOI 10.1016/j.ejpb.2004.03.018
Pubmed ID
Authors

S Drotleff, U Lungwitz, M Breunig, A Dennis, T Blunk, J Tessmar, A Göpferich

Abstract

This review describes recent developments in the emerging field of biomimetic polymeric biomaterials, which signal to cells via biologically active entities. The described biological effects are, in contrast to many other known interactions, receptor mediated and therefore very specific for certain cell types. As an introduction into this field, first some biological principles are illustrated such as cell attachment, cytokine signaling and endocytosis, which are some of the mechanisms used to control cells with biomimetic polymers. The next topics are then the basic design rules for the creation of biomimetic materials. Here, the major emphasis is on polymers that are assembled in separate building blocks, meaning that the biologically active entity is attached to the polymer in a separate chemical reaction. In that respect, first individual chemical standard reactions that may be used for this step are briefly reviewed. In the following chapter, the emphasis is on polymer types that have been used for the development of several biomimetic materials. There is, thereby, a delineation made between materials that are processed to devices exceeding cellular dimensions and materials predominantly used for the assembly of nanostructures. Finally, we give a few current examples for applications in which biomimetic polymers have been applied to achieve a better biomaterial performance.

Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 183 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
India 3 2%
Germany 2 1%
Mexico 2 1%
United Kingdom 1 <1%
United States 1 <1%
Unknown 174 95%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Ph. D. Student 54 30%
Student > Master 27 15%
Researcher 26 14%
Student > Bachelor 17 9%
Student > Postgraduate 8 4%
Other 25 14%
Unknown 26 14%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Chemistry 40 22%
Materials Science 26 14%
Engineering 24 13%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 20 11%
Medicine and Dentistry 12 7%
Other 29 16%
Unknown 32 17%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 4. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 20 February 2018.
All research outputs
#8,262,445
of 25,374,917 outputs
Outputs from European Journal of Pharmaceutics & Biopharmaceutics
#876
of 2,801 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#22,551
of 69,942 outputs
Outputs of similar age from European Journal of Pharmaceutics & Biopharmaceutics
#16
of 17 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,374,917 research outputs across all sources so far. This one has received more attention than most of these and is in the 66th percentile.
So far Altmetric has tracked 2,801 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 3.9. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 67% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 69,942 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 67% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 17 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 5th percentile – i.e., 5% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.