↓ Skip to main content

Cytoplasmic contractions in growing fungal hyphae and their morphogenetic consequences

Overview of attention for article published in Archives of Microbiology, April 2005
Altmetric Badge

Mentioned by

video
1 YouTube creator

Readers on

mendeley
19 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Cytoplasmic contractions in growing fungal hyphae and their morphogenetic consequences
Published in
Archives of Microbiology, April 2005
DOI 10.1007/s00203-005-0771-z
Pubmed ID
Authors

Cristina G. Reynaga-Peña, Salomón Bartnicki-García

Abstract

Video-enhanced light microscopy of the apical and subapical regions of growing hyphae of several fungal species revealed the existence of momentary synchronized motions of subcellular organelles. First discovered in a temperature-sensitive morphological mutant (ramosa-1) of Aspergillus niger, these seemingly spontaneous cytoplasmic contractions were also detected in wild-type hyphae of A. niger, Neurospora crassa, and Trichoderma atroviride. Cytoplasmic contractions in all fungi lasted about 1 s. Although the cytoplasm recovered its motility and appearance, the contraction usually led to drastic changes in Spitzenkörper (apical body) behavior and hyphal morphology, often both. Within 10 s after the contraction, the Spitzenkörper commonly became dislodged from its polar position; sometimes it disassembled into phase-dark and phase-light components; more commonly, it disappeared completely. Whether partial or complete, the dislocation of the Spitzenkörper was always accompanied by a sharp reduction or cessation of growth, and was usually followed by marked morphological changes that included bulbous hyphal tips, bulges in the hyphal profile, and formation of subapical and apical branches. The cytoplasmic contractions are vivid evidence that the most conspicuous cell organelles (membrane-bound) in living hyphae are interconnected via a contractile cytoskeletal network.

Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 19 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
United Kingdom 1 5%
Slovakia 1 5%
Brazil 1 5%
Unknown 16 84%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Bachelor 4 21%
Student > Master 3 16%
Researcher 3 16%
Professor > Associate Professor 2 11%
Student > Ph. D. Student 2 11%
Other 3 16%
Unknown 2 11%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 12 63%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 3 16%
Immunology and Microbiology 1 5%
Social Sciences 1 5%
Materials Science 1 5%
Other 0 0%
Unknown 1 5%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 1. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 02 December 2010.
All research outputs
#20,187,333
of 22,703,044 outputs
Outputs from Archives of Microbiology
#2,333
of 2,761 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#57,896
of 59,587 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Archives of Microbiology
#3
of 3 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 22,703,044 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 1st percentile – i.e., 1% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 2,761 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 3.7. This one is in the 1st percentile – i.e., 1% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 59,587 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 1st percentile – i.e., 1% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 3 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one.