↓ Skip to main content

Investigating the Locomotion of the Sandfish in Desert Sand Using NMR-Imaging

Overview of attention for article published in PLOS ONE, October 2008
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 5% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (97th percentile)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (92nd percentile)

Mentioned by

news
2 news outlets
blogs
3 blogs
wikipedia
3 Wikipedia pages
video
1 YouTube creator

Citations

dimensions_citation
55 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
81 Mendeley
connotea
1 Connotea
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Investigating the Locomotion of the Sandfish in Desert Sand Using NMR-Imaging
Published in
PLOS ONE, October 2008
DOI 10.1371/journal.pone.0003309
Pubmed ID
Authors

Werner Baumgartner, Florian Fidler, Agnes Weth, Martin Habbecke, Peter Jakob, Christoph Butenweg, Wolfgang Böhme

Abstract

The sandfish (Scincus scincus) is a lizard having the remarkable ability to move through desert sand for significant distances. It is well adapted to living in loose sand by virtue of a combination of morphological and behavioural specializations. We investigated the bodyform of the sandfish using 3D-laserscanning and explored its locomotion in loose desert sand using fast nuclear magnetic resonance (NMR) imaging. The sandfish exhibits an in-plane meandering motion with a frequency of about 3 Hz and an amplitude of about half its body length accompanied by swimming-like (or trotting) movements of its limbs. No torsion of the body was observed, a movement required for a digging-behaviour. Simple calculations based on the Janssen model for granular material related to our findings on bodyform and locomotor behaviour render a local decompaction of the sand surrounding the moving sandfish very likely. Thus the sand locally behaves as a viscous fluid and not as a solid material. In this fluidised sand the sandfish is able to "swim" using its limbs.

Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 81 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Germany 6 7%
United States 1 1%
Unknown 74 91%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Researcher 16 20%
Student > Ph. D. Student 14 17%
Student > Bachelor 13 16%
Student > Master 11 14%
Professor 5 6%
Other 10 12%
Unknown 12 15%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 27 33%
Engineering 16 20%
Physics and Astronomy 9 11%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 3 4%
Environmental Science 2 2%
Other 9 11%
Unknown 15 19%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 40. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 15 March 2024.
All research outputs
#1,028,366
of 25,494,370 outputs
Outputs from PLOS ONE
#13,217
of 222,215 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#2,207
of 101,516 outputs
Outputs of similar age from PLOS ONE
#31
of 409 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,494,370 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 95th percentile: it's in the top 5% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 222,215 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 15.8. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 94% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 101,516 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 97% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 409 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 92% of its contemporaries.