↓ Skip to main content

Profile differences between overdose and non-overdose suicide attempts in a multi-ethnic Asian society

Overview of attention for article published in BMC Psychiatry, November 2016
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age
  • Average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source

Mentioned by

twitter
6 X users

Readers on

mendeley
53 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Profile differences between overdose and non-overdose suicide attempts in a multi-ethnic Asian society
Published in
BMC Psychiatry, November 2016
DOI 10.1186/s12888-016-1105-1
Pubmed ID
Authors

Cyrus S. H. Ho, Y. L. Ong, Gabriel H. J. Tan, S. N. Yeo, Roger C. M. Ho

Abstract

This study explores differences in characteristics of overdose (OD) and non-overdose (NOD) suicide attempts in Singapore. Four hundred eighty-five medical records of people who attempted suicide were extracted from a local general hospital patient database and classified into OD and NOD groups. Differences in socio-demographic factors, suicide characteristics and hospital admission types between both groups were examined. Indians were more likely than the Chinese and Malays to employ OD method in their attempts. More suicide attempts in the OD group than NOD group were self-reported. The most likely place for suicide attempts for both groups was at home, though more NOD suicide attempts were in public areas as compared to the OD group. Analgesics were the most used substance in the OD group. Those who attempted suicide using OD had a higher number of psychiatric ward admissions than the NOD group. Risk and protective factors varied between both groups. Differences in socio-demographics, suicide characteristics and admission characteristics between OD and NOD groups were observed. Recommendations for suicide prevention in the community are discussed. Further studies on the mediators and moderators of these trends and characteristics of suicide attempts are necessary to ensure maximal efficacy of prevention and management.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 6 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 53 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Mexico 1 2%
Unknown 52 98%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Bachelor 9 17%
Student > Master 7 13%
Student > Doctoral Student 7 13%
Other 5 9%
Researcher 4 8%
Other 11 21%
Unknown 10 19%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Psychology 15 28%
Medicine and Dentistry 8 15%
Social Sciences 6 11%
Nursing and Health Professions 3 6%
Arts and Humanities 2 4%
Other 8 15%
Unknown 11 21%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 3. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 26 November 2016.
All research outputs
#13,566,023
of 23,881,329 outputs
Outputs from BMC Psychiatry
#2,852
of 4,939 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#159,871
of 315,523 outputs
Outputs of similar age from BMC Psychiatry
#54
of 91 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 23,881,329 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 42nd percentile – i.e., 42% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 4,939 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 12.9. This one is in the 41st percentile – i.e., 41% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 315,523 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 48th percentile – i.e., 48% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 91 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 41st percentile – i.e., 41% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.