You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Attention Score in Context
Twitter Journal Club in Medical Radiation Science
Journal of Medical Imaging & Radiation Sciences, March 2017
Geoff Currie, Nick Woznitza, Amanda Bolderston, Adam Westerink, Julia Watson, Charlotte Beardmore, Lisa Di Prospero, Carly McCuaig, Julie Nightingale
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 39 tweeters who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
|Members of the public||25||64%|
|Science communicators (journalists, bloggers, editors)||5||13%|
|Practitioners (doctors, other healthcare professionals)||3||8%|
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 47 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
|Readers by professional status||Count||As %|
|Student > Master||9||19%|
|Student > Bachelor||6||13%|
|Student > Doctoral Student||3||6%|
|Readers by discipline||Count||As %|
|Nursing and Health Professions||9||19%|
|Medicine and Dentistry||8||17%|
|Pharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceutical Science||1||2%|
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 46. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 01 April 2020.
All research outputs
of 23,342,092 outputs
Outputs from Journal of Medical Imaging & Radiation Sciences
of 850 outputs
Outputs of similar age
of 312,050 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Journal of Medical Imaging & Radiation Sciences
of 20 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 23,342,092 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 96th percentile: it's in the top 5% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 850 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a little more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 5.6. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 98% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 312,050 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 94% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 20 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 95% of its contemporaries.