↓ Skip to main content

Twitter Journal Club in Medical Radiation Science

Overview of attention for article published in Journal of Medical Imaging & Radiation Sciences, March 2017
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 5% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • One of the highest-scoring outputs from this source (#5 of 371)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (92nd percentile)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (94th percentile)

Mentioned by

twitter
42 tweeters
facebook
1 Facebook page

Citations

dimensions_citation
3 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
19 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Twitter Journal Club in Medical Radiation Science
Published in
Journal of Medical Imaging & Radiation Sciences, March 2017
DOI 10.1016/j.jmir.2016.09.001
Authors

Geoff Currie, Nick Woznitza, Amanda Bolderston, Adam Westerink, Julia Watson, Charlotte Beardmore, Lisa Di Prospero, Carly McCuaig, Julie Nightingale

Twitter Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 42 tweeters who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 19 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Japan 1 5%
Unknown 18 95%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Unspecified 5 26%
Student > Master 4 21%
Other 3 16%
Student > Ph. D. Student 2 11%
Student > Doctoral Student 2 11%
Other 3 16%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Unspecified 8 42%
Medicine and Dentistry 3 16%
Computer Science 2 11%
Arts and Humanities 2 11%
Social Sciences 2 11%
Other 2 11%

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 32. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 09 September 2018.
All research outputs
#438,099
of 12,280,928 outputs
Outputs from Journal of Medical Imaging & Radiation Sciences
#5
of 371 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#19,111
of 263,325 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Journal of Medical Imaging & Radiation Sciences
#1
of 18 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 12,280,928 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 96th percentile: it's in the top 5% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 371 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 4.9. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 98% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 263,325 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 92% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 18 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 94% of its contemporaries.