You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
X Demographics
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
| Title |
Twitter Journal Club in Medical Radiation Science
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Journal of Medical Imaging & Radiation Sciences, November 2016
|
| DOI | 10.1016/j.jmir.2016.09.001 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Geoff Currie, Nick Woznitza, Amanda Bolderston, Adam Westerink, Julia Watson, Charlotte Beardmore, Lisa Di Prospero, Carly McCuaig, Julie Nightingale |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 39 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| United Kingdom | 13 | 33% |
| Canada | 5 | 13% |
| New Zealand | 4 | 10% |
| Australia | 3 | 8% |
| United States | 2 | 5% |
| Ireland | 1 | 3% |
| Guinea | 1 | 3% |
| Ecuador | 1 | 3% |
| Unknown | 9 | 23% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Members of the public | 25 | 64% |
| Scientists | 6 | 15% |
| Science communicators (journalists, bloggers, editors) | 5 | 13% |
| Practitioners (doctors, other healthcare professionals) | 3 | 8% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 49 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Unknown | 49 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Student > Master | 10 | 20% |
| Student > Bachelor | 6 | 12% |
| Other | 4 | 8% |
| Lecturer | 3 | 6% |
| Student > Doctoral Student | 3 | 6% |
| Other | 8 | 16% |
| Unknown | 15 | 31% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Nursing and Health Professions | 9 | 18% |
| Medicine and Dentistry | 8 | 16% |
| Computer Science | 5 | 10% |
| Social Sciences | 2 | 4% |
| Pharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceutical Science | 1 | 2% |
| Other | 5 | 10% |
| Unknown | 19 | 39% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 46. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 01 April 2020.
All research outputs
#930,351
of 25,728,855 outputs
Outputs from Journal of Medical Imaging & Radiation Sciences
#17
of 1,002 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#17,201
of 318,426 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Journal of Medical Imaging & Radiation Sciences
#1
of 23 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,728,855 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 96th percentile: it's in the top 5% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 1,002 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a little more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 5.5. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 98% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 318,426 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 94% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 23 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 95% of its contemporaries.