↓ Skip to main content

Neutrophil Extracellular Trap (NET)-Mediated Killing of Pseudomonas aeruginosa: Evidence of Acquired Resistance within the CF Airway, Independent of CFTR

Overview of attention for article published in PLOS ONE, September 2011
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age
  • Average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source

Mentioned by

patent
1 patent

Citations

dimensions_citation
188 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
169 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Neutrophil Extracellular Trap (NET)-Mediated Killing of Pseudomonas aeruginosa: Evidence of Acquired Resistance within the CF Airway, Independent of CFTR
Published in
PLOS ONE, September 2011
DOI 10.1371/journal.pone.0023637
Pubmed ID
Authors

Robert L. Young, Kenneth C. Malcolm, Jennifer E. Kret, Silvia M. Caceres, Katie R. Poch, David P. Nichols, Jennifer L. Taylor-Cousar, Milene T. Saavedra, Scott H. Randell, Michael L. Vasil, Jane L. Burns, Samuel M. Moskowitz, Jerry A. Nick

Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 169 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
United States 2 1%
Mexico 1 <1%
Portugal 1 <1%
Poland 1 <1%
Unknown 164 97%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Ph. D. Student 39 23%
Researcher 31 18%
Student > Master 23 14%
Student > Bachelor 23 14%
Student > Doctoral Student 7 4%
Other 20 12%
Unknown 26 15%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 51 30%
Medicine and Dentistry 31 18%
Immunology and Microbiology 29 17%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 21 12%
Pharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceutical Science 3 2%
Other 6 4%
Unknown 28 17%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 3. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 20 December 2022.
All research outputs
#7,682,308
of 23,377,816 outputs
Outputs from PLOS ONE
#93,659
of 199,897 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#44,180
of 126,354 outputs
Outputs of similar age from PLOS ONE
#1,051
of 2,532 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 23,377,816 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 44th percentile – i.e., 44% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 199,897 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 15.3. This one is in the 48th percentile – i.e., 48% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 126,354 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 38th percentile – i.e., 38% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 2,532 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 47th percentile – i.e., 47% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.