↓ Skip to main content

Pre-emptive treatment for cytomegalovirus viraemia to prevent cytomegalovirus disease in solid organ transplant recipients

Overview of attention for article published in Cochrane database of systematic reviews, February 2013
Altmetric Badge

Mentioned by

twitter
1 tweeter

Readers on

mendeley
93 Mendeley
citeulike
1 CiteULike
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Pre-emptive treatment for cytomegalovirus viraemia to prevent cytomegalovirus disease in solid organ transplant recipients
Published in
Cochrane database of systematic reviews, February 2013
DOI 10.1002/14651858.cd005133.pub3
Pubmed ID
Authors

Daniel S Owers, Angela C Webster, Giovanni FM Strippoli, Kathy Kable, Elisabeth M Hodson

Abstract

Cytomegalovirus (CMV) is a significant cause of morbidity and mortality in solid organ transplant recipients. Pre-emptive treatment of patients with CMV viraemia using antiviral agents has been suggested as an alternative to routine prophylaxis to prevent CMV disease. This is an update of a Cochrane review first published in 2005.

Twitter Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profile of 1 tweeter who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 93 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Germany 1 1%
France 1 1%
Argentina 1 1%
Belgium 1 1%
Spain 1 1%
Unknown 88 95%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Bachelor 16 17%
Student > Master 15 16%
Student > Ph. D. Student 13 14%
Researcher 8 9%
Other 7 8%
Other 19 20%
Unknown 15 16%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 43 46%
Nursing and Health Professions 8 9%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 6 6%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 4 4%
Social Sciences 3 3%
Other 9 10%
Unknown 20 22%

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 1. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 02 April 2013.
All research outputs
#10,024,007
of 12,527,219 outputs
Outputs from Cochrane database of systematic reviews
#8,484
of 8,923 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#100,812
of 144,787 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Cochrane database of systematic reviews
#90
of 105 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 12,527,219 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 11th percentile – i.e., 11% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 8,923 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 21.2. This one is in the 3rd percentile – i.e., 3% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 144,787 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 16th percentile – i.e., 16% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 105 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 3rd percentile – i.e., 3% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.