You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
X Demographics
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
| Title |
A response to Cafaro, Hansson & Götmark (2022): Shifting the narrative from overpopulation to overconsumption
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Biological Conservation, September 2022
|
| DOI | 10.1016/j.biocon.2022.109698 |
| Authors |
Aalayna R. Green, Asia Murphy, Ben R. Collison, Manuel Sánchez-Nivicela, Hazel Anderson, Janelle L. Morano, Tyus D. Williams, Christine E. Wilkinson |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 214 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| United States | 36 | 17% |
| Canada | 13 | 6% |
| United Kingdom | 11 | 5% |
| Germany | 8 | 4% |
| India | 5 | 2% |
| Australia | 5 | 2% |
| Spain | 4 | 2% |
| Ireland | 4 | 2% |
| Indonesia | 3 | 1% |
| Other | 22 | 10% |
| Unknown | 103 | 48% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Members of the public | 117 | 55% |
| Scientists | 84 | 39% |
| Science communicators (journalists, bloggers, editors) | 12 | 6% |
| Practitioners (doctors, other healthcare professionals) | 1 | <1% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 35 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Unknown | 35 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Student > Bachelor | 5 | 14% |
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 5 | 14% |
| Researcher | 4 | 11% |
| Student > Master | 4 | 11% |
| Lecturer | 2 | 6% |
| Other | 7 | 20% |
| Unknown | 8 | 23% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 10 | 29% |
| Environmental Science | 6 | 17% |
| Social Sciences | 2 | 6% |
| Unspecified | 1 | 3% |
| Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology | 1 | 3% |
| Other | 4 | 11% |
| Unknown | 11 | 31% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 205. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 23 June 2023.
All research outputs
#195,401
of 25,779,988 outputs
Outputs from Biological Conservation
#118
of 6,695 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#5,714
of 431,500 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Biological Conservation
#2
of 86 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,779,988 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 99th percentile: it's in the top 5% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 6,695 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 25.0. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 98% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 431,500 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 98% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 86 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 97% of its contemporaries.