↓ Skip to main content

The First 50 Years of Electronic Watermarking

Overview of attention for article published in Applied Signal Processing, February 2002
Altmetric Badge

Mentioned by

patent
2 patents

Citations

dimensions_citation
264 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
69 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
The First 50 Years of Electronic Watermarking
Published in
Applied Signal Processing, February 2002
DOI 10.1155/s1110865702000525
Authors

Ingemar J. Cox, Matt L. Miller

Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 69 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Iran, Islamic Republic of 1 1%
Cuba 1 1%
Germany 1 1%
Brazil 1 1%
Unknown 65 94%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Ph. D. Student 17 25%
Student > Master 8 12%
Researcher 6 9%
Student > Postgraduate 6 9%
Other 5 7%
Other 18 26%
Unknown 9 13%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Computer Science 36 52%
Engineering 20 29%
Mathematics 2 3%
Social Sciences 1 1%
Unknown 10 14%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 3. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 21 February 2023.
All research outputs
#8,785,110
of 25,992,468 outputs
Outputs from Applied Signal Processing
#1
of 1 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#30,296
of 124,381 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Applied Signal Processing
#1
of 1 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,992,468 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 43rd percentile – i.e., 43% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 1 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 3.0. This one scored the same or higher as 0 of them.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 124,381 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 16th percentile – i.e., 16% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 1 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has scored higher than all of them