↓ Skip to main content

Long-Term Outcomes and Genetic Predictors of Response to Metastasis-Directed Therapy Versus Observation in Oligometastatic Prostate Cancer: Analysis of STOMP and ORIOLE Trials

Overview of attention for article published in Journal of Clinical Oncology, August 2022
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 5% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (98th percentile)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (93rd percentile)

Mentioned by

news
6 news outlets
blogs
1 blog
twitter
198 X users

Citations

dimensions_citation
109 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
95 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Long-Term Outcomes and Genetic Predictors of Response to Metastasis-Directed Therapy Versus Observation in Oligometastatic Prostate Cancer: Analysis of STOMP and ORIOLE Trials
Published in
Journal of Clinical Oncology, August 2022
DOI 10.1200/jco.22.00644
Pubmed ID
Authors

Matthew P. Deek, Kim Van der Eecken, Philip Sutera, Rebecca A. Deek, Valérie Fonteyne, Adrianna A. Mendes, Karel Decaestecker, Ana Ponce Kiess, Nicolaas Lumen, Ryan Phillips, Aurélie De Bruycker, Mark Mishra, Zaker Rana, Jason Molitoris, Bieke Lambert, Louke Delrue, Hailun Wang, Kathryn Lowe, Sofie Verbeke, Jo Van Dorpe, Renée Bultijnck, Geert Villeirs, Kathia De Man, Filip Ameye, Daniel Y. Song, Theodore DeWeese, Channing J. Paller, Felix Y. Feng, Alexander Wyatt, Kenneth J. Pienta, Maximillian Diehn, Soren M. Bentzen, Steven Joniau, Friedl Vanhaverbeke, Gert De Meerleer, Emmanuel S. Antonarakis, Tamara L. Lotan, Alejandro Berlin, Shankar Siva, Piet Ost, Phuoc T. Tran

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 198 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
As of 1 July 2024, you may notice a temporary increase in the numbers of X profiles with Unknown location. Click here to learn more.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 95 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 95 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Researcher 20 21%
Unspecified 8 8%
Other 6 6%
Student > Postgraduate 5 5%
Student > Bachelor 4 4%
Other 15 16%
Unknown 37 39%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 33 35%
Unspecified 9 9%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 3 3%
Engineering 3 3%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 2 2%
Other 3 3%
Unknown 42 44%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 166. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 26 June 2023.
All research outputs
#261,521
of 26,538,769 outputs
Outputs from Journal of Clinical Oncology
#467
of 23,223 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#7,231
of 436,622 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Journal of Clinical Oncology
#13
of 199 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 26,538,769 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 99th percentile: it's in the top 5% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 23,223 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 21.2. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 97% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 436,622 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 98% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 199 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 93% of its contemporaries.