↓ Skip to main content

MIPEP recessive variants cause a syndrome of left ventricular non-compaction, hypotonia, and infantile death

Overview of attention for article published in Genome Medicine, November 2016
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 25% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • Good Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (75th percentile)
  • Average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source

Mentioned by

twitter
1 X user
patent
1 patent
wikipedia
1 Wikipedia page

Citations

dimensions_citation
44 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
68 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
MIPEP recessive variants cause a syndrome of left ventricular non-compaction, hypotonia, and infantile death
Published in
Genome Medicine, November 2016
DOI 10.1186/s13073-016-0360-6
Pubmed ID
Authors

Mohammad K. Eldomery, Zeynep C. Akdemir, F.-Nora Vögtle, Wu-Lin Charng, Patrycja Mulica, Jill A. Rosenfeld, Tomasz Gambin, Shen Gu, Lindsay C. Burrage, Aisha Al Shamsi, Samantha Penney, Shalini N. Jhangiani, Holly H. Zimmerman, Donna M. Muzny, Xia Wang, Jia Tang, Ravi Medikonda, Prasanna V. Ramachandran, Lee-Jun Wong, Eric Boerwinkle, Richard A. Gibbs, Christine M. Eng, Seema R. Lalani, Jozef Hertecant, Richard J. Rodenburg, Omar A. Abdul-Rahman, Yaping Yang, Fan Xia, Meng C. Wang, James R. Lupski, Chris Meisinger, V. Reid Sutton

Abstract

Mitochondrial presequence proteases perform fundamental functions as they process about 70 % of all mitochondrial preproteins that are encoded in the nucleus and imported posttranslationally. The mitochondrial intermediate presequence protease MIP/Oct1, which carries out precursor processing, has not yet been established to have a role in human disease. Whole exome sequencing was performed on four unrelated probands with left ventricular non-compaction (LVNC), developmental delay (DD), seizures, and severe hypotonia. Proposed pathogenic variants were confirmed by Sanger sequencing or array comparative genomic hybridization. Functional analysis of the identified MIP variants was performed using the model organism Saccharomyces cerevisiae as the protein and its functions are highly conserved from yeast to human. Biallelic single nucleotide variants (SNVs) or copy number variants (CNVs) in MIPEP, which encodes MIP, were present in all four probands, three of whom had infantile/childhood death. Two patients had compound heterozygous SNVs (p.L582R/p.L71Q and p.E602*/p.L306F) and one patient from a consanguineous family had a homozygous SNV (p.K343E). The fourth patient, identified through the GeneMatcher tool, a part of the Matchmaker Exchange Project, was found to have inherited a paternal SNV (p.H512D) and a maternal CNV (1.4-Mb deletion of 13q12.12) that includes MIPEP. All amino acids affected in the patients' missense variants are highly conserved from yeast to human and therefore S. cerevisiae was employed for functional analysis (for p.L71Q, p.L306F, and p.K343E). The mutations p.L339F (human p.L306F) and p.K376E (human p.K343E) resulted in a severe decrease of Oct1 protease activity and accumulation of non-processed Oct1 substrates and consequently impaired viability under respiratory growth conditions. The p.L83Q (human p.L71Q) failed to localize to the mitochondria. Our findings reveal for the first time the role of the mitochondrial intermediate peptidase in human disease. Loss of MIP function results in a syndrome which consists of LVNC, DD, seizures, hypotonia, and cataracts. Our approach highlights the power of data exchange and the importance of an interrelationship between clinical and research efforts for disease gene discovery.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profile of 1 X user who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 68 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
France 1 1%
Unknown 67 99%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Researcher 12 18%
Student > Bachelor 12 18%
Student > Ph. D. Student 7 10%
Other 4 6%
Professor 3 4%
Other 10 15%
Unknown 20 29%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 16 24%
Medicine and Dentistry 11 16%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 7 10%
Nursing and Health Professions 4 6%
Computer Science 2 3%
Other 7 10%
Unknown 21 31%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 7. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 25 August 2022.
All research outputs
#4,933,668
of 24,124,781 outputs
Outputs from Genome Medicine
#923
of 1,493 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#77,946
of 316,029 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Genome Medicine
#23
of 35 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 24,124,781 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done well and is in the 79th percentile: it's in the top 25% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 1,493 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 26.6. This one is in the 38th percentile – i.e., 38% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 316,029 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 75% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 35 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 37th percentile – i.e., 37% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.