↓ Skip to main content

Geometric Interpretation of Gene Coexpression Network Analysis

Overview of attention for article published in PLoS Computational Biology, August 2008
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 25% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (88th percentile)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (81st percentile)

Mentioned by

twitter
1 X user
patent
2 patents
wikipedia
6 Wikipedia pages

Citations

dimensions_citation
686 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
721 Mendeley
citeulike
29 CiteULike
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Geometric Interpretation of Gene Coexpression Network Analysis
Published in
PLoS Computational Biology, August 2008
DOI 10.1371/journal.pcbi.1000117
Pubmed ID
Authors

Steve Horvath, Jun Dong

Abstract

THE MERGING OF NETWORK THEORY AND MICROARRAY DATA ANALYSIS TECHNIQUES HAS SPAWNED A NEW FIELD: gene coexpression network analysis. While network methods are increasingly used in biology, the network vocabulary of computational biologists tends to be far more limited than that of, say, social network theorists. Here we review and propose several potentially useful network concepts. We take advantage of the relationship between network theory and the field of microarray data analysis to clarify the meaning of and the relationship among network concepts in gene coexpression networks. Network theory offers a wealth of intuitive concepts for describing the pairwise relationships among genes, which are depicted in cluster trees and heat maps. Conversely, microarray data analysis techniques (singular value decomposition, tests of differential expression) can also be used to address difficult problems in network theory. We describe conditions when a close relationship exists between network analysis and microarray data analysis techniques, and provide a rough dictionary for translating between the two fields. Using the angular interpretation of correlations, we provide a geometric interpretation of network theoretic concepts and derive unexpected relationships among them. We use the singular value decomposition of module expression data to characterize approximately factorizable gene coexpression networks, i.e., adjacency matrices that factor into node specific contributions. High and low level views of coexpression networks allow us to study the relationships among modules and among module genes, respectively. We characterize coexpression networks where hub genes are significant with respect to a microarray sample trait and show that the network concept of intramodular connectivity can be interpreted as a fuzzy measure of module membership. We illustrate our results using human, mouse, and yeast microarray gene expression data. The unification of coexpression network methods with traditional data mining methods can inform the application and development of systems biologic methods.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profile of 1 X user who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 721 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
United States 29 4%
United Kingdom 5 <1%
Germany 3 <1%
Mexico 3 <1%
Brazil 3 <1%
Argentina 2 <1%
Spain 2 <1%
France 2 <1%
Australia 2 <1%
Other 13 2%
Unknown 657 91%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Ph. D. Student 187 26%
Researcher 178 25%
Student > Master 77 11%
Professor > Associate Professor 45 6%
Student > Bachelor 39 5%
Other 110 15%
Unknown 85 12%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 287 40%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 95 13%
Computer Science 60 8%
Medicine and Dentistry 33 5%
Mathematics 31 4%
Other 104 14%
Unknown 111 15%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 10. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 19 April 2020.
All research outputs
#3,415,054
of 25,373,627 outputs
Outputs from PLoS Computational Biology
#3,021
of 8,960 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#10,338
of 92,604 outputs
Outputs of similar age from PLoS Computational Biology
#9
of 48 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,373,627 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done well and is in the 86th percentile: it's in the top 25% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 8,960 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 20.4. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 65% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 92,604 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 88% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 48 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done well, scoring higher than 81% of its contemporaries.