You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Attention Score in Context
Serious adverse events of special interest following mRNA COVID-19 vaccination in randomized trials in adults
Vaccine, September 2022
Joseph Fraiman, Juan Erviti, Mark Jones, Sander Greenland, Patrick Whelan, Robert M. Kaplan, Peter Doshi
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 32,376 tweeters who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
|Members of the public||30989||96%|
|Practitioners (doctors, other healthcare professionals)||581||2%|
|Science communicators (journalists, bloggers, editors)||226||<1%|
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 207 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
|Readers by professional status||Count||As %|
|Student > Ph. D. Student||14||7%|
|Student > Postgraduate||10||5%|
|Readers by discipline||Count||As %|
|Medicine and Dentistry||42||20%|
|Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology||14||7%|
|Immunology and Microbiology||6||3%|
|Pharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceutical Science||6||3%|
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 16756. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 25 September 2023.
All research outputs
of 24,498,639 outputs
Outputs from Vaccine
of 16,090 outputs
Outputs of similar age
of 420,350 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Vaccine
of 170 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 24,498,639 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 99th percentile: it's in the top 5% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 16,090 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 16.7. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 99% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 420,350 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 99% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 170 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 99% of its contemporaries.