You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
X Demographics
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
Title |
Implementation lessons learnt when trialling palliative care interventions in the intensive care unit: relationships between determinants, implementation strategies, and models of delivery—a systematic review protocol
|
---|---|
Published in |
Systematic Reviews, September 2022
|
DOI | 10.1186/s13643-022-02054-8 |
Pubmed ID | |
Authors |
S. A. Meddick-Dyson, J. W. Boland, M. Pearson, S. Greenley, R. Gambe, J. R. Budding, F. E. M. Murtagh |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 9 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
Country | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
United Kingdom | 5 | 56% |
Australia | 1 | 11% |
Unknown | 3 | 33% |
Demographic breakdown
Type | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Practitioners (doctors, other healthcare professionals) | 4 | 44% |
Members of the public | 3 | 33% |
Scientists | 2 | 22% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 15 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
Country | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Unknown | 15 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Researcher | 3 | 20% |
Unspecified | 2 | 13% |
Student > Postgraduate | 2 | 13% |
Student > Ph. D. Student | 1 | 7% |
Student > Master | 1 | 7% |
Other | 1 | 7% |
Unknown | 5 | 33% |
Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Nursing and Health Professions | 5 | 33% |
Unspecified | 2 | 13% |
Medicine and Dentistry | 2 | 13% |
Chemistry | 1 | 7% |
Unknown | 5 | 33% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 6. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 12 September 2022.
All research outputs
#5,723,693
of 23,317,888 outputs
Outputs from Systematic Reviews
#976
of 2,020 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#105,370
of 433,809 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Systematic Reviews
#26
of 66 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 23,317,888 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done well and is in the 75th percentile: it's in the top 25% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 2,020 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 12.9. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 51% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 433,809 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 75% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 66 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 60% of its contemporaries.