You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
X Demographics
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
| Title |
DNA Vaccine Delivered by a Needle-Free Injection Device Improves Potency of Priming for Antibody and CD8+ T-Cell Responses after rAd5 Boost in a Randomized Clinical Trial
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
PLOS ONE, April 2013
|
| DOI | 10.1371/journal.pone.0059340 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Barney S. Graham, Mary E. Enama, Martha C. Nason, Ingelise J. Gordon, Sheila A. Peel, Julie E. Ledgerwood, Sarah A. Plummer, John R. Mascola, Robert T. Bailer, Mario Roederer, Richard A. Koup, Gary J. Nabel |
| Abstract |
DNA vaccine immunogenicity has been limited by inefficient delivery. Needle-free delivery of DNA using a CO2-powered Biojector® device was compared to delivery by needle and syringe and evaluated for safety and immunogenicity. |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profile of 1 X user who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Iceland | 1 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Members of the public | 1 | 100% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 82 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Ireland | 1 | 1% |
| Unknown | 81 | 99% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Researcher | 17 | 21% |
| Student > Master | 13 | 16% |
| Student > Bachelor | 13 | 16% |
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 8 | 10% |
| Student > Doctoral Student | 7 | 9% |
| Other | 8 | 10% |
| Unknown | 16 | 20% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Medicine and Dentistry | 14 | 17% |
| Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology | 12 | 15% |
| Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 11 | 13% |
| Immunology and Microbiology | 10 | 12% |
| Pharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceutical Science | 5 | 6% |
| Other | 13 | 16% |
| Unknown | 17 | 21% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 9. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 04 August 2020.
All research outputs
#3,671,339
of 22,705,019 outputs
Outputs from PLOS ONE
#45,383
of 193,828 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#31,655
of 199,277 outputs
Outputs of similar age from PLOS ONE
#1,061
of 5,282 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 22,705,019 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done well and is in the 83rd percentile: it's in the top 25% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 193,828 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 15.0. This one has done well, scoring higher than 76% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 199,277 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 84% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 5,282 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done well, scoring higher than 79% of its contemporaries.