↓ Skip to main content
What is this page? Embed badge

Maternal nutritional risk factors for pre-eclampsia incidence: findings from a narrative scoping review

Overview of attention for article published in Reproductive Health, September 2022
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 25% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (87th percentile)
  • Good Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (73rd percentile)

Mentioned by

twitter
20 tweeters

Citations

dimensions_citation
1 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
32 Mendeley
Summary Twitter Dimensions citations
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Maternal nutritional risk factors for pre-eclampsia incidence: findings from a narrative scoping review
Published in
Reproductive Health, September 2022
DOI 10.1186/s12978-022-01485-9
Pubmed ID
36064716
Authors

Mai-Lei Woo Kinshella, Shazmeen Omar, Kerri Scherbinsky, Marianne Vidler, Laura A. Magee, Peter von Dadelszen, Sophie E. Moore, Rajavel Elango, Peter von Dadelszen, Laura A. Magee, Lucilla Poston, Hiten D. Mistry, Marie-Laure Volvert, Cristina Escalona Lopez, Sophie Moore, Rachel Tribe, Andrew Shennan, Tatiana Salisbury, Lucy Chappell, Rachel Craik, Marleen Temmerman, Angela Koech Etyang, Sikolia Wanyonyi, Geoffrey Omuse, Patricia Okiro, Grace Mwashigadi, Esperança Sevene, Helena Boene, Corssino Tchavana, Eusebio Macete, Carla Carillho, Lazaro Quimice, Sonia Maculuve, Donna Russell, Ben Baratt, Joy Lawn, Hannah Blencowe, Veronique Filippi, Matt Silver, Prestige Tatenda Makanga, Liberty Makacha, Yolisa Dube, Newton Nyapwere, Reason Mlambo, Umberto D’Alessandro, Anna Roca, Melisa Martinez-Alvarez, Hawanatu Jah, Brahima Diallo, Abdul Karim Sesay, Fatima Touray, Abdoulie Sillah, Alison Noble, Aris Papageorghiou, Judith Cartwright, Guy Whitley, Sanjeev Krishna, Rosemarie Townsend, Asma Khalil, Marianne Vidler, Joel Singer, Jing Li, Jeffrey Bone, Mai-Lei Woo Kinshella, Kelly Pickerill, Ash Sandhu, Tu Domena, Rajavel Elango, William Stones

View on publisher site

Twitter Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 20 tweeters who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 32 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 32 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Unspecified 4 13%
Student > Bachelor 4 13%
Student > Ph. D. Student 3 9%
Student > Master 2 6%
Researcher 2 6%
Other 2 6%
Unknown 15 47%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Unspecified 4 13%
Medicine and Dentistry 3 9%
Nursing and Health Professions 3 9%
Pharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceutical Science 2 6%
Environmental Science 2 6%
Other 4 13%
Unknown 14 44%

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 12. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 18 January 2023.
All research outputs
#2,707,311
of 23,322,258 outputs
Outputs from Reproductive Health
#285
of 1,433 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#56,032
of 435,543 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Reproductive Health
#6
of 23 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 23,322,258 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done well and is in the 88th percentile: it's in the top 25% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 1,433 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 12.1. This one has done well, scoring higher than 80% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 435,543 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 87% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 23 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 73% of its contemporaries.

This page is provided by Altmetric.