↓ Skip to main content

Genome-Wide Analysis of Effectors of Peroxisome Biogenesis

Overview of attention for article published in PLOS ONE, August 2010
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Good Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (70th percentile)
  • Above-average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (54th percentile)

Mentioned by

blogs
1 blog

Citations

dimensions_citation
24 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
72 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Genome-Wide Analysis of Effectors of Peroxisome Biogenesis
Published in
PLOS ONE, August 2010
DOI 10.1371/journal.pone.0011953
Pubmed ID
Authors

Ramsey A. Saleem, Rose Long-O'Donnell, David J. Dilworth, Abraham M. Armstrong, Arvind P. Jamakhandi, Yakun Wan, Theo A. Knijnenburg, Antti Niemistö, John Boyle, Richard A. Rachubinski, Ilya Shmulevich, John D. Aitchison

Abstract

Peroxisomes are intracellular organelles that house a number of diverse metabolic processes, notably those required for beta-oxidation of fatty acids. Peroxisomes biogenesis can be induced by the presence of peroxisome proliferators, including fatty acids, which activate complex cellular programs that underlie the induction process. Here, we used multi-parameter quantitative phenotype analyses of an arrayed mutant collection of yeast cells induced to proliferate peroxisomes, to establish a comprehensive inventory of genes required for peroxisome induction and function. The assays employed include growth in the presence of fatty acids, and confocal imaging and flow cytometry through the induction process. In addition to the classical phenotypes associated with loss of peroxisomal functions, these studies identified 169 genes required for robust signaling, transcription, normal peroxisomal development and morphologies, and transmission of peroxisomes to daughter cells. These gene products are localized throughout the cell, and many have indirect connections to peroxisome function. By integration with extant data sets, we present a total of 211 genes linked to peroxisome biogenesis and highlight the complex networks through which information flows during peroxisome biogenesis and function.

Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 72 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
United States 3 4%
Israel 1 1%
Portugal 1 1%
Germany 1 1%
Unknown 66 92%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Researcher 29 40%
Student > Ph. D. Student 11 15%
Student > Master 6 8%
Student > Bachelor 5 7%
Other 4 6%
Other 11 15%
Unknown 6 8%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 45 63%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 12 17%
Chemical Engineering 1 1%
Nursing and Health Professions 1 1%
Pharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceutical Science 1 1%
Other 5 7%
Unknown 7 10%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 6. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 03 August 2010.
All research outputs
#5,849,775
of 22,705,019 outputs
Outputs from PLOS ONE
#70,179
of 193,828 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#27,492
of 94,387 outputs
Outputs of similar age from PLOS ONE
#345
of 754 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 22,705,019 research outputs across all sources so far. This one has received more attention than most of these and is in the 74th percentile.
So far Altmetric has tracked 193,828 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 15.0. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 63% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 94,387 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 70% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 754 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 54% of its contemporaries.