↓ Skip to main content

Depression, Cognition, and Self-Appraisal of Functional Abilities in HIV: An Examination of Subjective Appraisal Versus Objective Performance

Overview of attention for article published in The Clinical Neuropsychologist, January 2011
Altmetric Badge

Mentioned by

twitter
3 X users

Readers on

mendeley
110 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Depression, Cognition, and Self-Appraisal of Functional Abilities in HIV: An Examination of Subjective Appraisal Versus Objective Performance
Published in
The Clinical Neuropsychologist, January 2011
DOI 10.1080/13854046.2010.539577
Pubmed ID
Authors

April D. Thames, Brian W. Becker, Thomas D. Marcotte, Lindsay J. Hines, Jessica M. Foley, Amir Ramezani, Elyse J. Singer, Steven A. Castellon, Robert K. Heaton, Charles H. Hinkin

Abstract

Depression frequently co-occurs with HIV infection and can result in self-reported overestimates of cognitive deficits. Conversely, genuine cognitive dysfunction can lead to an under-appreciation of cognitive deficits. The degree to which depression and cognition influence self-report of capacity for instrumental activities of daily living (IADLs) requires further investigation. This study examined the effects of depression and cognitive deficits on self-appraisal of functional competence among 107 HIV-infected adults. As hypothesized, higher levels of depression were found among those who over-reported problems in medication management, driving, and cognition when compared to those who under-reported or provided accurate self-assessments. In contrast, genuine cognitive dysfunction was predictive of under-reporting of functional deficits. Together, these results suggest that over-reliance on self-reported functional status poses risk for error when diagnoses require documentation of both cognitive impairment and associated functional disability in everyday life.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 3 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 110 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
United States 2 2%
Unknown 108 98%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Researcher 15 14%
Student > Ph. D. Student 13 12%
Student > Bachelor 12 11%
Student > Doctoral Student 10 9%
Student > Master 10 9%
Other 24 22%
Unknown 26 24%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Psychology 29 26%
Medicine and Dentistry 18 16%
Nursing and Health Professions 9 8%
Social Sciences 8 7%
Neuroscience 7 6%
Other 8 7%
Unknown 31 28%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 2. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 29 April 2013.
All research outputs
#14,166,906
of 22,705,019 outputs
Outputs from The Clinical Neuropsychologist
#420
of 688 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#136,382
of 180,496 outputs
Outputs of similar age from The Clinical Neuropsychologist
#2
of 2 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 22,705,019 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 35th percentile – i.e., 35% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 688 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a little more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 6.3. This one is in the 37th percentile – i.e., 37% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 180,496 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 23rd percentile – i.e., 23% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 2 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one.