↓ Skip to main content
Embed badge What is this page?

Reply to McIntyre and McKitrick: Proxy-based temperature reconstructions are robust

Overview of attention for article published in Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America, February 2009
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 5% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (98th percentile)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (92nd percentile)

Mentioned by

blogs
4 blogs
twitter
24 tweeters
wikipedia
1 Wikipedia page

Citations

dimensions_citation
4 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
24 Mendeley

What is this page?

Summary Blogs Twitter Wikipedia Dimensions citations
Title
Reply to McIntyre and McKitrick: Proxy-based temperature reconstructions are robust
Published in
Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America, February 2009
DOI 10.1073/pnas.0812936106
Authors

Michael E. Mann, Raymond S. Bradley, Malcolm K. Hughes

View on publisher site

Twitter Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 24 tweeters who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 24 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
United Kingdom 1 4%
Czechia 1 4%
Italy 1 4%
Germany 1 4%
Unknown 20 83%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Researcher 11 46%
Professor 6 25%
Student > Ph. D. Student 3 13%
Professor > Associate Professor 2 8%
Other 1 4%
Other 1 4%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Earth and Planetary Sciences 8 33%
Environmental Science 6 25%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 2 8%
Physics and Astronomy 2 8%
Computer Science 1 4%
Other 2 8%
Unknown 3 13%

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 42. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 04 March 2023.
All research outputs
#863,952
of 23,318,744 outputs
Outputs from Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America
#14,079
of 99,223 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#3,113
of 174,035 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America
#49
of 671 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 23,318,744 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 96th percentile: it's in the top 5% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 99,223 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 37.4. This one has done well, scoring higher than 85% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 174,035 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 98% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 671 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 92% of its contemporaries.

This page is provided by Altmetric.