You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
X Demographics
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
| Title |
Reply to McIntyre and McKitrick: Proxy-based temperature reconstructions are robust
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America, February 2009
|
| DOI | 10.1073/pnas.0812936106 |
| Authors |
Michael E. Mann, Raymond S. Bradley, Malcolm K. Hughes |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 28 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| United Kingdom | 3 | 11% |
| Australia | 2 | 7% |
| Canada | 2 | 7% |
| New Zealand | 1 | 4% |
| United States | 1 | 4% |
| Ireland | 1 | 4% |
| Unknown | 18 | 64% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Members of the public | 23 | 82% |
| Scientists | 5 | 18% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 24 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| United Kingdom | 1 | 4% |
| Czechia | 1 | 4% |
| Italy | 1 | 4% |
| Germany | 1 | 4% |
| Unknown | 20 | 83% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Researcher | 11 | 46% |
| Professor | 6 | 25% |
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 3 | 13% |
| Professor > Associate Professor | 2 | 8% |
| Other | 1 | 4% |
| Other | 1 | 4% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Earth and Planetary Sciences | 8 | 33% |
| Environmental Science | 6 | 25% |
| Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 2 | 8% |
| Physics and Astronomy | 2 | 8% |
| Computer Science | 1 | 4% |
| Other | 2 | 8% |
| Unknown | 3 | 13% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 43. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 03 April 2024.
All research outputs
#973,208
of 25,630,321 outputs
Outputs from Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America
#15,069
of 103,475 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#3,387
of 190,113 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America
#49
of 682 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,630,321 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 96th percentile: it's in the top 5% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 103,475 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 39.6. This one has done well, scoring higher than 85% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 190,113 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 98% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 682 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 92% of its contemporaries.