The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 27 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
As of 1 July 2024, you may notice a temporary increase in the numbers of X profiles with Unknown location. Click here to learn more.
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
Timeline
X Demographics
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
Title |
Reply to McIntyre and McKitrick: Proxy-based temperature reconstructions are robust
|
---|---|
Published in |
Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America, February 2009
|
DOI | 10.1073/pnas.0812936106 |
Authors |
Michael E. Mann, Raymond S. Bradley, Malcolm K. Hughes |
X Demographics
Geographical breakdown
Country | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
United Kingdom | 4 | 15% |
Canada | 2 | 7% |
Sweden | 1 | 4% |
New Zealand | 1 | 4% |
Ireland | 1 | 4% |
United States | 1 | 4% |
Australia | 1 | 4% |
Unknown | 16 | 59% |
Demographic breakdown
Type | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Members of the public | 23 | 85% |
Scientists | 4 | 15% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 24 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
Country | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
United Kingdom | 1 | 4% |
Czechia | 1 | 4% |
Italy | 1 | 4% |
Germany | 1 | 4% |
Unknown | 20 | 83% |
Demographic breakdown
Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Researcher | 11 | 46% |
Professor | 6 | 25% |
Student > Ph. D. Student | 3 | 13% |
Professor > Associate Professor | 2 | 8% |
Other | 1 | 4% |
Other | 1 | 4% |
Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Earth and Planetary Sciences | 8 | 33% |
Environmental Science | 6 | 25% |
Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 2 | 8% |
Physics and Astronomy | 2 | 8% |
Computer Science | 1 | 4% |
Other | 2 | 8% |
Unknown | 3 | 13% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 53. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 19 October 2024.
All research outputs
#864,946
of 26,789,092 outputs
Outputs from Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America
#13,669
of 105,569 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#2,852
of 195,943 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America
#47
of 689 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 26,789,092 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 96th percentile: it's in the top 5% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 105,569 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 40.4. This one has done well, scoring higher than 87% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 195,943 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 98% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 689 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 93% of its contemporaries.