↓ Skip to main content

Reply to McIntyre and McKitrick: Proxy-based temperature reconstructions are robust

Overview of attention for article published in Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America, February 2009
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 5% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (98th percentile)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (93rd percentile)

Mentioned by

blogs
6 blogs
twitter
25 X users
wikipedia
1 Wikipedia page

Citations

dimensions_citation
4 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
24 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Reply to McIntyre and McKitrick: Proxy-based temperature reconstructions are robust
Published in
Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America, February 2009
DOI 10.1073/pnas.0812936106
Authors

Michael E. Mann, Raymond S. Bradley, Malcolm K. Hughes

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 25 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
As of 1 July 2024, you may notice a temporary increase in the numbers of X profiles with Unknown location. Click here to learn more.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 24 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
United Kingdom 1 4%
Czechia 1 4%
Italy 1 4%
Germany 1 4%
Unknown 20 83%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Researcher 11 46%
Professor 6 25%
Student > Ph. D. Student 3 13%
Professor > Associate Professor 2 8%
Other 1 4%
Other 1 4%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Earth and Planetary Sciences 8 33%
Environmental Science 6 25%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 2 8%
Physics and Astronomy 2 8%
Computer Science 1 4%
Other 2 8%
Unknown 3 13%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 52. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 30 June 2024.
All research outputs
#854,485
of 26,215,093 outputs
Outputs from Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America
#13,576
of 104,558 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#2,837
of 193,420 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America
#46
of 687 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 26,215,093 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 96th percentile: it's in the top 5% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 104,558 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 39.8. This one has done well, scoring higher than 87% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 193,420 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 98% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 687 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 93% of its contemporaries.