You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
X Demographics
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
Title |
Ewing Sarcoma and Osteosarcoma Have Distinct Immune Signatures and Intercellular Communication Networks.
|
---|---|
Published in |
Clinical Cancer Research, September 2022
|
DOI | 10.1158/1078-0432.ccr-22-1471 |
Pubmed ID | |
Authors |
Anthony R Cillo, Elina Mukherjee, Nathanael G Bailey, Sayali Onkar, Jessica Daley, Claudia Salgado, Xiang Li, Dongyan Liu, Sarangarajan Ranganathan, Melissa Burgess, John Sembrat, Kurt Weiss, Rebecca Watters, Tullia C Bruno, Dario A A Vignali, Kelly M Bailey |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 22 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
Country | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
United States | 11 | 50% |
Ireland | 1 | 5% |
Taiwan | 1 | 5% |
Brazil | 1 | 5% |
Unknown | 8 | 36% |
Demographic breakdown
Type | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Members of the public | 10 | 45% |
Scientists | 10 | 45% |
Practitioners (doctors, other healthcare professionals) | 2 | 9% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 12 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
Country | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Unknown | 12 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Unspecified | 2 | 17% |
Student > Master | 2 | 17% |
Student > Ph. D. Student | 2 | 17% |
Lecturer | 1 | 8% |
Researcher | 1 | 8% |
Other | 1 | 8% |
Unknown | 3 | 25% |
Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Medicine and Dentistry | 5 | 42% |
Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 2 | 17% |
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology | 1 | 8% |
Unknown | 4 | 33% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 23. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 03 January 2023.
All research outputs
#1,607,481
of 25,364,936 outputs
Outputs from Clinical Cancer Research
#1,142
of 13,211 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#35,171
of 432,552 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Clinical Cancer Research
#32
of 138 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,364,936 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 93rd percentile: it's in the top 10% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 13,211 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 11.7. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 91% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 432,552 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 91% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 138 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done well, scoring higher than 77% of its contemporaries.