↓ Skip to main content

Editorial: Haptic training simulation, volume II

Overview of attention for article published in Frontiers in Robotics and AI, September 2022
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age
  • Average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source

Mentioned by

twitter
2 X users

Citations

dimensions_citation
1 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
1 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Editorial: Haptic training simulation, volume II
Published in
Frontiers in Robotics and AI, September 2022
DOI 10.3389/frobt.2022.965113
Pubmed ID
Authors

Xiaojun Chen, Arnaud Lelevé, Troy McDaniel, Carlos Rossa

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 2 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 1. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 09 September 2022.
All research outputs
#18,349,015
of 23,577,761 outputs
Outputs from Frontiers in Robotics and AI
#1,176
of 1,568 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#283,619
of 434,095 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Frontiers in Robotics and AI
#48
of 98 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 23,577,761 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 19th percentile – i.e., 19% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 1,568 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 12.0. This one is in the 13th percentile – i.e., 13% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 434,095 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 30th percentile – i.e., 30% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 98 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 30th percentile – i.e., 30% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.