↓ Skip to main content

Maternal position during caesarean section for preventing maternal and neonatal complications

Overview of attention for article published in Cochrane database of systematic reviews, March 2013
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 25% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (94th percentile)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (86th percentile)

Mentioned by

policy
1 policy source
twitter
32 tweeters
facebook
4 Facebook pages

Citations

dimensions_citation
32 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
140 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Maternal position during caesarean section for preventing maternal and neonatal complications
Published in
Cochrane database of systematic reviews, March 2013
DOI 10.1002/14651858.cd007623.pub3
Pubmed ID
Authors

Catherine Cluver, Natalia Novikova, G Justus Hofmeyr, David R Hall

Abstract

During caesarean section mothers can be in different positions. Theatre tables could be tilted laterally, upwards, downwards or flexed and wedges or cushions could be used. There is no consensus on the best positioning at present.

Twitter Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 32 tweeters who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 140 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Turkey 2 1%
United States 1 <1%
France 1 <1%
Unknown 136 97%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Researcher 20 14%
Student > Bachelor 16 11%
Student > Postgraduate 15 11%
Student > Ph. D. Student 14 10%
Student > Master 14 10%
Other 38 27%
Unknown 23 16%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 75 54%
Social Sciences 7 5%
Nursing and Health Professions 7 5%
Psychology 5 4%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 3 2%
Other 12 9%
Unknown 31 22%

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 25. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 13 August 2019.
All research outputs
#804,829
of 15,411,813 outputs
Outputs from Cochrane database of systematic reviews
#2,274
of 11,183 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#8,394
of 154,659 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Cochrane database of systematic reviews
#14
of 105 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 15,411,813 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 94th percentile: it's in the top 10% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 11,183 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 23.1. This one has done well, scoring higher than 79% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 154,659 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 94% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 105 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done well, scoring higher than 86% of its contemporaries.