You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
Title |
Reply
|
---|---|
Published in |
Journal of Climate, November 2007
|
DOI | 10.1175/2007jcli1894.1 |
Authors |
Michael E. Mann, Scott Rutherford, Eugene Wahl, Caspar Ammann |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 9 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
Country | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Sweden | 1 | 11% |
Australia | 1 | 11% |
Unknown | 7 | 78% |
Demographic breakdown
Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Researcher | 2 | 22% |
Student > Ph. D. Student | 1 | 11% |
Student > Bachelor | 1 | 11% |
Professor > Associate Professor | 1 | 11% |
Unknown | 4 | 44% |
Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Earth and Planetary Sciences | 4 | 44% |
Environmental Science | 1 | 11% |
Unknown | 4 | 44% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 9. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 01 February 2011.
All research outputs
#3,798,611
of 25,373,627 outputs
Outputs from Journal of Climate
#2,689
of 8,286 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#9,742
of 85,198 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Journal of Climate
#13
of 41 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,373,627 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done well and is in the 83rd percentile: it's in the top 25% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 8,286 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 12.5. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 66% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 85,198 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 85% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 41 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 65% of its contemporaries.