↓ Skip to main content

Reply

Overview of attention for article published in Journal of Climate, November 2007
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 25% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (85th percentile)
  • Good Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (65th percentile)

Mentioned by

blogs
1 blog

Citations

dimensions_citation
17 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
9 Mendeley
Title
Reply
Published in
Journal of Climate, November 2007
DOI 10.1175/2007jcli1894.1
Authors

Michael E. Mann, Scott Rutherford, Eugene Wahl, Caspar Ammann

Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 9 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Sweden 1 11%
Australia 1 11%
Unknown 7 78%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Researcher 2 22%
Student > Ph. D. Student 1 11%
Student > Bachelor 1 11%
Professor > Associate Professor 1 11%
Unknown 4 44%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Earth and Planetary Sciences 4 44%
Environmental Science 1 11%
Unknown 4 44%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 9. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 01 February 2011.
All research outputs
#3,798,611
of 25,373,627 outputs
Outputs from Journal of Climate
#2,689
of 8,286 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#9,742
of 85,198 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Journal of Climate
#13
of 41 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,373,627 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done well and is in the 83rd percentile: it's in the top 25% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 8,286 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 12.5. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 66% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 85,198 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 85% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 41 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 65% of its contemporaries.