↓ Skip to main content

Efficacy of deep brain stimulation for treatment-resistant obsessive-compulsive disorder: systematic review and meta-analysis

Overview of attention for article published in Journal of neurology, neurosurgery and psychiatry, September 2022
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 5% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • Among the highest-scoring outputs from this source (#20 of 7,498)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (99th percentile)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (97th percentile)

Mentioned by

news
66 news outlets
blogs
2 blogs
twitter
66 X users
wikipedia
1 Wikipedia page

Citations

dimensions_citation
55 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
47 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Efficacy of deep brain stimulation for treatment-resistant obsessive-compulsive disorder: systematic review and meta-analysis
Published in
Journal of neurology, neurosurgery and psychiatry, September 2022
DOI 10.1136/jnnp-2021-328738
Pubmed ID
Authors

Ron Gadot, Ricardo Najera, Samad Hirani, Adrish Anand, Eric Storch, Wayne K Goodman, Ben Shofty, Sameer A Sheth

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 66 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
As of 1 July 2024, you may notice a temporary increase in the numbers of X profiles with Unknown location. Click here to learn more.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 47 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 47 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Ph. D. Student 7 15%
Student > Doctoral Student 4 9%
Student > Bachelor 3 6%
Student > Master 3 6%
Researcher 2 4%
Other 5 11%
Unknown 23 49%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 7 15%
Neuroscience 5 11%
Engineering 4 9%
Psychology 4 9%
Nursing and Health Professions 1 2%
Other 2 4%
Unknown 24 51%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 550. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 26 July 2024.
All research outputs
#46,717
of 26,377,159 outputs
Outputs from Journal of neurology, neurosurgery and psychiatry
#20
of 7,498 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#1,443
of 441,507 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Journal of neurology, neurosurgery and psychiatry
#2
of 75 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 26,377,159 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 99th percentile: it's in the top 5% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 7,498 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 14.5. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 99% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 441,507 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 99% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 75 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 97% of its contemporaries.