↓ Skip to main content

5回の手術を経て長期生存しえた左心房原発未分化多形成肉腫の1例

Overview of attention for article published in Japanese Journal of Cardiovascular Surgery, July 2022
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Above-average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (53rd percentile)

Mentioned by

twitter
4 X users
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
5回の手術を経て長期生存しえた左心房原発未分化多形成肉腫の1例
Published in
Japanese Journal of Cardiovascular Surgery, July 2022
DOI 10.4326/jjcvs.51.208
Authors

村上 忠弘, 南村 弘佳, 馬場 俊雄, 新田目 淳孝

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 4 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 2. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 23 September 2022.
All research outputs
#15,485,623
of 25,852,155 outputs
Outputs from Japanese Journal of Cardiovascular Surgery
#32
of 53 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#194,474
of 434,272 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Japanese Journal of Cardiovascular Surgery
#1
of 3 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,852,155 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 38th percentile – i.e., 38% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 53 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 2.7. This one is in the 37th percentile – i.e., 37% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 434,272 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 53% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 3 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has scored higher than all of them