You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
X Demographics
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
Title |
Clinical outcome and quality of life after reoperative CABG: off-pump versus on-pump – observational pilot study
|
---|---|
Published in |
Journal of Cardiothoracic Surgery, April 2013
|
DOI | 10.1186/1749-8090-8-66 |
Pubmed ID | |
Authors |
Engin Usta, Raoof Elkrinawi, Adrian Ursulescu, Ragi Nagib, Martin Mädge, Schahriar Salehi-Gilani, Ulrich FW Franke |
Abstract |
Coronary artery bypass grafting (CABG) on cardiopulmonary bypass (CBP) is associated with significant morbidity and mortality. In high-risk patients, doomed for reoperation the adverse effects of CBP may be more striking. We evaluated the results of reoperative CABG (redo-CABG) by either off-pump (OPCAB) or on-pump (ONCAB). Clinical endpoints were perioperative myocardial infarction, mortality, survival and as the most striking difference between prior studies the quality of life (QoL). |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 2 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
Country | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Unknown | 2 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
Type | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Practitioners (doctors, other healthcare professionals) | 1 | 50% |
Members of the public | 1 | 50% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 42 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
Country | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
United Kingdom | 1 | 2% |
Brazil | 1 | 2% |
Unknown | 40 | 95% |
Demographic breakdown
Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Student > Master | 8 | 19% |
Researcher | 7 | 17% |
Other | 5 | 12% |
Student > Postgraduate | 3 | 7% |
Student > Doctoral Student | 3 | 7% |
Other | 9 | 21% |
Unknown | 7 | 17% |
Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Medicine and Dentistry | 22 | 52% |
Nursing and Health Professions | 4 | 10% |
Social Sciences | 2 | 5% |
Economics, Econometrics and Finance | 2 | 5% |
Pharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceutical Science | 1 | 2% |
Other | 4 | 10% |
Unknown | 7 | 17% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 1. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 05 April 2013.
All research outputs
#15,268,549
of 22,705,019 outputs
Outputs from Journal of Cardiothoracic Surgery
#380
of 1,209 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#125,039
of 199,925 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Journal of Cardiothoracic Surgery
#14
of 27 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 22,705,019 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 22nd percentile – i.e., 22% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 1,209 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 2.2. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 56% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 199,925 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 27th percentile – i.e., 27% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 27 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 29th percentile – i.e., 29% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.