↓ Skip to main content

Implementation of an In Situ Qualitative Debriefing Tool for Resuscitations

Overview of attention for article published in Resuscitation, July 2013
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age

Mentioned by

twitter
2 tweeters

Citations

dimensions_citation
18 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
77 Mendeley
Title
Implementation of an In Situ Qualitative Debriefing Tool for Resuscitations
Published in
Resuscitation, July 2013
DOI 10.1016/j.resuscitation.2012.12.005
Pubmed ID
Authors

Paul C. Mullan, Elizabeth Wuestner, Tarra D. Kerr, Daniel P. Christopher, Binita Patel

Abstract

Multiple guidelines recommend debriefing of resuscitations to improve clinical performance. We implemented a novel standardized debriefing program using a Debriefing In Situ Conversation after Emergent Resuscitation Now (DISCERN) tool.

Twitter Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 2 tweeters who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 77 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Spain 2 3%
Chile 1 1%
Switzerland 1 1%
United Kingdom 1 1%
Colombia 1 1%
Unknown 71 92%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Professor > Associate Professor 11 14%
Researcher 11 14%
Student > Master 10 13%
Other 9 12%
Student > Ph. D. Student 8 10%
Other 28 36%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 44 57%
Nursing and Health Professions 12 16%
Unspecified 5 6%
Social Sciences 5 6%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 3 4%
Other 8 10%

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 1. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 11 April 2013.
All research outputs
#2,278,356
of 4,508,238 outputs
Outputs from Resuscitation
#911
of 1,363 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#43,760
of 89,427 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Resuscitation
#30
of 44 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 4,508,238 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 36th percentile – i.e., 36% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 1,363 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a little more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 6.4. This one is in the 21st percentile – i.e., 21% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 89,427 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 38th percentile – i.e., 38% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 44 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 20th percentile – i.e., 20% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.