↓ Skip to main content

Implementation of an In Situ Qualitative Debriefing Tool for Resuscitations

Overview of attention for article published in Resuscitation, December 2012
Altmetric Badge

Mentioned by

twitter
1 X user

Citations

dimensions_citation
114 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
212 Mendeley
Title
Implementation of an In Situ Qualitative Debriefing Tool for Resuscitations
Published in
Resuscitation, December 2012
DOI 10.1016/j.resuscitation.2012.12.005
Pubmed ID
Authors

Paul C. Mullan, Elizabeth Wuestner, Tarra D. Kerr, Daniel P. Christopher, Binita Patel

Abstract

Multiple guidelines recommend debriefing of resuscitations to improve clinical performance. We implemented a novel standardized debriefing program using a Debriefing In Situ Conversation after Emergent Resuscitation Now (DISCERN) tool.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profile of 1 X user who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 212 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Spain 2 <1%
Colombia 1 <1%
Chile 1 <1%
Switzerland 1 <1%
Denmark 1 <1%
United Kingdom 1 <1%
Unknown 205 97%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Master 35 17%
Researcher 24 11%
Student > Doctoral Student 20 9%
Student > Ph. D. Student 17 8%
Other 16 8%
Other 56 26%
Unknown 44 21%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 94 44%
Nursing and Health Professions 43 20%
Psychology 5 2%
Social Sciences 4 2%
Business, Management and Accounting 3 1%
Other 11 5%
Unknown 52 25%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 1. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 04 March 2021.
All research outputs
#17,286,379
of 25,374,647 outputs
Outputs from Resuscitation
#3,996
of 5,693 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#193,598
of 288,776 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Resuscitation
#45
of 53 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,374,647 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 21st percentile – i.e., 21% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 5,693 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 11.0. This one is in the 23rd percentile – i.e., 23% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 288,776 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 23rd percentile – i.e., 23% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 53 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 5th percentile – i.e., 5% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.