↓ Skip to main content

Seclusion and restraint for people with serious mental illnesses

Overview of attention for article published in Cochrane database of systematic reviews, January 2000
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 25% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (89th percentile)
  • Good Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (68th percentile)

Mentioned by

policy
1 policy source
twitter
16 tweeters
weibo
1 weibo user

Citations

dimensions_citation
225 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
112 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Seclusion and restraint for people with serious mental illnesses
Published in
Cochrane database of systematic reviews, January 2000
DOI 10.1002/14651858.cd001163
Authors

Eila ES Sailas, Mark Fenton

Twitter Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 16 tweeters who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 112 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Denmark 2 2%
Serbia 1 <1%
Australia 1 <1%
United States 1 <1%
Netherlands 1 <1%
Unknown 106 95%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Master 19 17%
Student > Ph. D. Student 14 13%
Researcher 14 13%
Student > Postgraduate 12 11%
Other 12 11%
Other 41 37%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 41 37%
Psychology 24 21%
Nursing and Health Professions 16 14%
Unspecified 12 11%
Social Sciences 7 6%
Other 12 11%

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 13. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 12 June 2019.
All research outputs
#1,191,100
of 13,105,281 outputs
Outputs from Cochrane database of systematic reviews
#3,639
of 10,476 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#15,081
of 146,506 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Cochrane database of systematic reviews
#36
of 114 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 13,105,281 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 90th percentile: it's in the top 10% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 10,476 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 20.6. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 65% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 146,506 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 89% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 114 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 68% of its contemporaries.