The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 17 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
As of 1 July 2024, you may notice a temporary increase in the numbers of X profiles with Unknown location. Click here to learn more.
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
X Demographics
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
| Title |
Local interventions for the management of alveolar osteitis (dry socket)
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Cochrane database of systematic reviews, September 2022
|
| DOI | 10.1002/14651858.cd006968.pub3 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Blánaid Jm Daly, Mohammad O Sharif, Kate Jones, Helen V Worthington, Anna Beattie |
X Demographics
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| United Kingdom | 2 | 12% |
| Spain | 1 | 6% |
| Unknown | 14 | 82% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Members of the public | 13 | 76% |
| Practitioners (doctors, other healthcare professionals) | 3 | 18% |
| Scientists | 1 | 6% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 126 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Unknown | 126 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Student > Master | 12 | 10% |
| Researcher | 11 | 9% |
| Student > Bachelor | 11 | 9% |
| Other | 7 | 6% |
| Student > Doctoral Student | 5 | 4% |
| Other | 13 | 10% |
| Unknown | 67 | 53% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Medicine and Dentistry | 43 | 34% |
| Nursing and Health Professions | 4 | 3% |
| Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 3 | 2% |
| Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology | 3 | 2% |
| Immunology and Microbiology | 2 | 2% |
| Other | 6 | 5% |
| Unknown | 65 | 52% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 21. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 14 March 2024.
All research outputs
#1,898,039
of 26,377,159 outputs
Outputs from Cochrane database of systematic reviews
#3,872
of 13,214 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#39,915
of 442,550 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Cochrane database of systematic reviews
#46
of 119 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 26,377,159 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 92nd percentile: it's in the top 10% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 13,214 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 35.7. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 70% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 442,550 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 90% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 119 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 61% of its contemporaries.