You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
| Title |
A students’ oppinion on the importance of natural history collections and taxonomy in Brazil
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Zoologia, January 2022
|
| DOI | 10.1590/s1984-4689.v39.e21045 |
| Authors |
Mariana Beal-Neves, Alessandra Mielke, Suelen de Paiva Gamarra, Christian Beier, Carla Suertegaray Fontana |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 1 Mendeley reader of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Unknown | 1 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Unspecified | 1 | 100% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Unspecified | 1 | 100% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 6. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 26 September 2022.
All research outputs
#5,927,806
of 23,414,653 outputs
Outputs from Zoologia
#69
of 375 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#130,749
of 508,689 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Zoologia
#5
of 15 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 23,414,653 research outputs across all sources so far. This one has received more attention than most of these and is in the 74th percentile.
So far Altmetric has tracked 375 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 4.9. This one has done well, scoring higher than 80% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 508,689 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 74% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 15 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 60% of its contemporaries.