You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
Title |
Halothiobacillus neapolitanus Carboxysomes Sequester Heterologous and Chimeric RubisCO Species
|
---|---|
Published in |
PLOS ONE, October 2008
|
DOI | 10.1371/journal.pone.0003570 |
Pubmed ID | |
Authors |
Balaraj B. Menon, Zhicheng Dou, Sabine Heinhorst, Jessup M. Shively, Gordon C. Cannon |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 111 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
Country | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
United States | 7 | 6% |
Australia | 2 | 2% |
Netherlands | 1 | <1% |
Singapore | 1 | <1% |
United Kingdom | 1 | <1% |
Unknown | 99 | 89% |
Demographic breakdown
Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Researcher | 32 | 29% |
Student > Ph. D. Student | 30 | 27% |
Student > Bachelor | 12 | 11% |
Student > Master | 6 | 5% |
Other | 5 | 5% |
Other | 16 | 14% |
Unknown | 10 | 9% |
Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 52 | 47% |
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology | 27 | 24% |
Chemistry | 8 | 7% |
Engineering | 4 | 4% |
Environmental Science | 2 | 2% |
Other | 6 | 5% |
Unknown | 12 | 11% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 11. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 20 January 2022.
All research outputs
#2,954,424
of 22,950,943 outputs
Outputs from PLOS ONE
#39,343
of 195,626 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#9,342
of 92,127 outputs
Outputs of similar age from PLOS ONE
#85
of 377 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 22,950,943 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done well and is in the 87th percentile: it's in the top 25% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 195,626 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 15.1. This one has done well, scoring higher than 79% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 92,127 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 89% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 377 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done well, scoring higher than 77% of its contemporaries.