You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
X Demographics
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
Title |
Reviewers’ scores do not predict impact: bibliometric analysis of the proceedings of the human–robot interaction conference
|
---|---|
Published in |
Scientometrics, November 2016
|
DOI | 10.1007/s11192-016-2176-y |
Authors |
Christoph Bartneck |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 38 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
Country | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
United Kingdom | 4 | 11% |
Sweden | 3 | 8% |
United States | 2 | 5% |
Spain | 2 | 5% |
Netherlands | 2 | 5% |
Australia | 2 | 5% |
Portugal | 1 | 3% |
Canada | 1 | 3% |
North Macedonia | 1 | 3% |
Other | 9 | 24% |
Unknown | 11 | 29% |
Demographic breakdown
Type | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Members of the public | 21 | 55% |
Scientists | 12 | 32% |
Science communicators (journalists, bloggers, editors) | 3 | 8% |
Practitioners (doctors, other healthcare professionals) | 2 | 5% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 29 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
Country | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
United Kingdom | 1 | 3% |
Unknown | 28 | 97% |
Demographic breakdown
Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Researcher | 6 | 21% |
Student > Ph. D. Student | 5 | 17% |
Professor | 3 | 10% |
Lecturer | 2 | 7% |
Professor > Associate Professor | 2 | 7% |
Other | 5 | 17% |
Unknown | 6 | 21% |
Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Computer Science | 7 | 24% |
Social Sciences | 3 | 10% |
Business, Management and Accounting | 2 | 7% |
Psychology | 2 | 7% |
Engineering | 2 | 7% |
Other | 5 | 17% |
Unknown | 8 | 28% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 20. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 31 December 2016.
All research outputs
#1,889,000
of 25,863,888 outputs
Outputs from Scientometrics
#346
of 2,978 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#31,409
of 313,568 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Scientometrics
#10
of 55 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,863,888 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 92nd percentile: it's in the top 10% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 2,978 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 10.9. This one has done well, scoring higher than 88% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 313,568 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 89% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 55 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done well, scoring higher than 81% of its contemporaries.