↓ Skip to main content

Extensive Gains and Losses of Olfactory Receptor Genes in Mammalian Evolution

Overview of attention for article published in PLOS ONE, August 2007
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 5% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (99th percentile)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (97th percentile)

Mentioned by

news
8 news outlets
blogs
5 blogs
twitter
2 X users
patent
1 patent
wikipedia
2 Wikipedia pages

Citations

dimensions_citation
279 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
291 Mendeley
citeulike
1 CiteULike
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Extensive Gains and Losses of Olfactory Receptor Genes in Mammalian Evolution
Published in
PLOS ONE, August 2007
DOI 10.1371/journal.pone.0000708
Pubmed ID
Authors

Yoshihito Niimura, Masatoshi Nei

Abstract

Odor perception in mammals is mediated by a large multigene family of olfactory receptor (OR) genes. The number of OR genes varies extensively among different species of mammals, and most species have a substantial number of pseudogenes. To gain some insight into the evolutionary dynamics of mammalian OR genes, we identified the entire set of OR genes in platypuses, opossums, cows, dogs, rats, and macaques and studied the evolutionary change of the genes together with those of humans and mice. We found that platypuses and primates have <400 functional OR genes while the other species have 800-1,200 functional OR genes. We then estimated the numbers of gains and losses of OR genes for each branch of the phylogenetic tree of mammals. This analysis showed that (i) gene expansion occurred in the placental lineage each time after it diverged from monotremes and from marsupials and (ii) hundreds of gains and losses of OR genes have occurred in an order-specific manner, making the gene repertoires highly variable among different orders. It appears that the number of OR genes is determined primarily by the functional requirement for each species, but once the number reaches the required level, it fluctuates by random duplication and deletion of genes. This fluctuation seems to have been aided by the stochastic nature of OR gene expression.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 2 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 291 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
United States 7 2%
Germany 3 1%
United Kingdom 3 1%
France 2 <1%
Netherlands 1 <1%
Sweden 1 <1%
Canada 1 <1%
Portugal 1 <1%
Russia 1 <1%
Other 1 <1%
Unknown 270 93%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Researcher 68 23%
Student > Ph. D. Student 52 18%
Student > Master 38 13%
Student > Bachelor 29 10%
Professor > Associate Professor 21 7%
Other 47 16%
Unknown 36 12%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 134 46%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 55 19%
Neuroscience 11 4%
Engineering 5 2%
Psychology 5 2%
Other 32 11%
Unknown 49 17%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 116. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 20 May 2023.
All research outputs
#299,250
of 22,705,019 outputs
Outputs from PLOS ONE
#4,454
of 193,828 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#404
of 67,132 outputs
Outputs of similar age from PLOS ONE
#6
of 200 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 22,705,019 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 98th percentile: it's in the top 5% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 193,828 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 15.0. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 97% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 67,132 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 99% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 200 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 97% of its contemporaries.