↓ Skip to main content

Fishery-Independent Data Reveal Negative Effect of Human Population Density on Caribbean Predatory Fish Communities

Overview of attention for article published in PLOS ONE, May 2009
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 25% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (89th percentile)
  • Good Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (76th percentile)

Mentioned by

blogs
1 blog
policy
1 policy source
twitter
1 X user

Citations

dimensions_citation
155 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
351 Mendeley
citeulike
1 CiteULike
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Fishery-Independent Data Reveal Negative Effect of Human Population Density on Caribbean Predatory Fish Communities
Published in
PLOS ONE, May 2009
DOI 10.1371/journal.pone.0005333
Pubmed ID
Authors

Christopher D. Stallings

Abstract

Understanding the current status of predatory fish communities, and the effects fishing has on them, is vitally important information for management. However, data are often insufficient at region-wide scales to assess the effects of extraction in coral reef ecosystems of developing nations.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profile of 1 X user who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 351 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
United States 6 2%
Brazil 5 1%
Mexico 4 1%
Argentina 2 <1%
Colombia 2 <1%
Mozambique 1 <1%
Australia 1 <1%
Kenya 1 <1%
Sweden 1 <1%
Other 10 3%
Unknown 318 91%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Researcher 91 26%
Student > Ph. D. Student 72 21%
Student > Master 53 15%
Student > Bachelor 34 10%
Other 15 4%
Other 52 15%
Unknown 34 10%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 183 52%
Environmental Science 98 28%
Earth and Planetary Sciences 10 3%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 4 1%
Social Sciences 4 1%
Other 12 3%
Unknown 40 11%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 11. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 10 February 2022.
All research outputs
#3,289,174
of 25,795,662 outputs
Outputs from PLOS ONE
#41,552
of 224,881 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#11,137
of 104,501 outputs
Outputs of similar age from PLOS ONE
#121
of 515 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,795,662 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done well and is in the 87th percentile: it's in the top 25% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 224,881 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 15.8. This one has done well, scoring higher than 81% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 104,501 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 89% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 515 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done well, scoring higher than 76% of its contemporaries.