↓ Skip to main content

Danazol for unexplained subfertility

Overview of attention for article published in Cochrane database of systematic reviews, January 2007
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Above-average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (62nd percentile)

Mentioned by

wikipedia
1 Wikipedia page

Citations

dimensions_citation
8 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
27 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Danazol for unexplained subfertility
Published in
Cochrane database of systematic reviews, January 2007
DOI 10.1002/14651858.cd000069.pub2
Pubmed ID
Authors

Edward Hughes, Julie Brown, G Tiffin

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 27 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
United Kingdom 1 4%
Unknown 26 96%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Researcher 4 15%
Student > Postgraduate 3 11%
Student > Master 3 11%
Other 3 11%
Librarian 3 11%
Other 11 41%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 11 41%
Unspecified 3 11%
Pharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceutical Science 2 7%
Neuroscience 2 7%
Engineering 1 4%
Other 8 30%

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 3. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 24 March 2018.
All research outputs
#3,707,541
of 12,701,041 outputs
Outputs from Cochrane database of systematic reviews
#6,869
of 10,403 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#83,510
of 236,491 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Cochrane database of systematic reviews
#119
of 159 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 12,701,041 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 49th percentile – i.e., 49% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 10,403 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 20.3. This one is in the 27th percentile – i.e., 27% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 236,491 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 62% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 159 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 23rd percentile – i.e., 23% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.