↓ Skip to main content

Low-Fat Dietary Pattern and Cancer Incidence in the Women's Health Initiative Dietary Modification Randomized Controlled Trial

Overview of attention for article published in JNCI: Journal of the National Cancer Institute, October 2007
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 5% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (97th percentile)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (91st percentile)

Mentioned by

news
2 news outlets
blogs
2 blogs
policy
1 policy source
twitter
14 tweeters
facebook
3 Facebook pages
video
2 video uploaders

Citations

dimensions_citation
148 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
87 Mendeley
citeulike
1 CiteULike
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Low-Fat Dietary Pattern and Cancer Incidence in the Women's Health Initiative Dietary Modification Randomized Controlled Trial
Published in
JNCI: Journal of the National Cancer Institute, October 2007
DOI 10.1093/jnci/djm159
Pubmed ID
Authors

R. L. Prentice, C. A. Thomson, B. Caan, F. A. Hubbell, G. L. Anderson, S. A. A. Beresford, M. Pettinger, D. S. Lane, L. Lessin, S. Yasmeen, B. Singh, J. Khandekar, J. M. Shikany, S. Satterfield, R. T. Chlebowski

Abstract

The Women's Health Initiative Dietary Modification (DM) Randomized Controlled Trial evaluated the effects of a low-fat dietary pattern on chronic disease incidence, with breast cancer and colorectal cancer as primary outcomes. The trial protocol also listed ovarian cancer and endometrial cancer as outcomes that may be favorably affected by the intervention.

Twitter Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 14 tweeters who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 87 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
United States 5 6%
United Kingdom 1 1%
Australia 1 1%
Peru 1 1%
France 1 1%
Unknown 78 90%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Master 17 20%
Student > Ph. D. Student 15 17%
Researcher 14 16%
Other 10 11%
Student > Bachelor 10 11%
Other 18 21%
Unknown 3 3%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 29 33%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 17 20%
Nursing and Health Professions 15 17%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 6 7%
Psychology 3 3%
Other 10 11%
Unknown 7 8%

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 50. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 05 October 2017.
All research outputs
#359,804
of 13,725,601 outputs
Outputs from JNCI: Journal of the National Cancer Institute
#335
of 6,461 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#3,696
of 148,822 outputs
Outputs of similar age from JNCI: Journal of the National Cancer Institute
#9
of 100 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 13,725,601 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 97th percentile: it's in the top 5% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 6,461 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 14.4. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 94% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 148,822 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 97% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 100 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 91% of its contemporaries.