↓ Skip to main content

Large, high-intensity fire events in southern California shrublands: debunking the fine-grain age patch model

Overview of attention for article published in Ecological Applications, January 2009
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 5% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • Among the highest-scoring outputs from this source (#33 of 2,202)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (98th percentile)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (94th percentile)

Mentioned by

news
1 news outlet
blogs
3 blogs
policy
1 policy source
twitter
66 tweeters
wikipedia
1 Wikipedia page

Citations

dimensions_citation
85 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
137 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Large, high-intensity fire events in southern California shrublands: debunking the fine-grain age patch model
Published in
Ecological Applications, January 2009
DOI 10.1890/08-0281.1
Authors

Jon E. Keeley, Paul H. Zedler

Twitter Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 66 tweeters who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 137 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
United States 8 6%
Australia 3 2%
Brazil 2 1%
Spain 1 <1%
Portugal 1 <1%
Germany 1 <1%
Turkey 1 <1%
Argentina 1 <1%
Canada 1 <1%
Other 0 0%
Unknown 118 86%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Researcher 38 28%
Student > Master 25 18%
Student > Ph. D. Student 14 10%
Other 12 9%
Student > Bachelor 11 8%
Other 37 27%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Environmental Science 51 37%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 48 35%
Earth and Planetary Sciences 13 9%
Unspecified 13 9%
Social Sciences 5 4%
Other 7 5%

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 81. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 31 May 2019.
All research outputs
#204,930
of 13,451,233 outputs
Outputs from Ecological Applications
#33
of 2,202 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#2,065
of 148,080 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Ecological Applications
#1
of 17 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 13,451,233 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 98th percentile: it's in the top 5% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 2,202 research outputs from this source. They typically receive more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 8.9. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 98% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 148,080 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 98% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 17 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 94% of its contemporaries.