↓ Skip to main content

Rejecters Overestimate the Negative Consequences They Will Face From Refusal

Overview of attention for article published in Journal of Experimental Psychology. Applied, June 2023
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 5% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • One of the highest-scoring outputs from this source (#9 of 731)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (98th percentile)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (93rd percentile)

Mentioned by

news
24 news outlets
blogs
1 blog
twitter
30 X users

Readers on

mendeley
11 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Rejecters Overestimate the Negative Consequences They Will Face From Refusal
Published in
Journal of Experimental Psychology. Applied, June 2023
DOI 10.1037/xap0000457
Pubmed ID
Authors

Jingyi Lu, Qingwen Fang, Tian Qiu

Timeline

Login to access the full chart related to this output.

If you don’t have an account, click here to discover Explorer

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 30 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
As of 1 July 2024, you may notice a temporary increase in the numbers of X profiles with Unknown location. Click here to learn more.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 11 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 11 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Ph. D. Student 2 18%
Researcher 1 9%
Other 1 9%
Student > Doctoral Student 1 9%
Unknown 6 55%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Psychology 3 27%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 1 9%
Social Sciences 1 9%
Neuroscience 1 9%
Unknown 5 45%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 215. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 29 February 2024.
All research outputs
#192,251
of 26,538,386 outputs
Outputs from Journal of Experimental Psychology. Applied
#9
of 731 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#4,436
of 400,991 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Journal of Experimental Psychology. Applied
#1
of 15 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 26,538,386 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 99th percentile: it's in the top 5% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 731 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 18.1. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 98% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 400,991 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 98% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 15 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 93% of its contemporaries.