You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
X Demographics
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
| Title |
The genome of the crustacean Parhyale hawaiensis, a model for animal development, regeneration, immunity and lignocellulose digestion
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
eLife, November 2016
|
| DOI | 10.7554/elife.20062 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Damian Kao, Alvina G Lai, Evangelia Stamataki, Silvana Rosic, Nikolaos Konstantinides, Erin Jarvis, Alessia Di Donfrancesco, Natalia Pouchkina-Stancheva, Marie Semon, Marco Grillo, Heather Bruce, Suyash Kumar, Igor Siwanowicz, Andy Le, Andrew Lemire, Michael B Eisen, Cassandra Extavour, William E Browne, Carsten Wolff, Michalis Averof, Nipam H Patel, Peter Sarkies, Anastasios Pavlopoulos, Aziz Aboobaker |
| Abstract |
The amphipod crustacean Parhyale hawaiensis is a blossoming model system for studies of developmental mechanisms and more recently regeneration. We have sequenced the genome allowing annotation of all key signaling pathways, transcription factors, and non-coding RNAs that will enhance ongoing functional studies. Parhyale is a member of the Malacostraca clade, which includes crustacean food crop species. We analysed the immunity related genes of Parhyale as an important comparative system for these species, where immunity related aquaculture problems have increased as farming has intensified. We also find that Parhyale and other species within Multicrustacea contain the enzyme sets necessary to perform lignocellulose digestion ('wood eating'), suggesting this ability may predate the diversification of this lineage. Our data provide an essential resource for further development of Parhyale as an experimental model. The first malacostracan genome will underpin ongoing comparative work in food crop species and research investigating lignocellulose as an energy source. |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 65 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| United States | 10 | 15% |
| United Kingdom | 8 | 12% |
| Germany | 6 | 9% |
| France | 4 | 6% |
| India | 3 | 5% |
| Japan | 2 | 3% |
| Netherlands | 2 | 3% |
| Spain | 2 | 3% |
| Mexico | 1 | 2% |
| Other | 6 | 9% |
| Unknown | 21 | 32% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Scientists | 36 | 55% |
| Members of the public | 28 | 43% |
| Science communicators (journalists, bloggers, editors) | 1 | 2% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 135 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| United Kingdom | 1 | <1% |
| Unknown | 134 | 99% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 26 | 19% |
| Researcher | 22 | 16% |
| Student > Bachelor | 19 | 14% |
| Student > Master | 10 | 7% |
| Student > Doctoral Student | 9 | 7% |
| Other | 18 | 13% |
| Unknown | 31 | 23% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 40 | 30% |
| Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology | 33 | 24% |
| Environmental Science | 13 | 10% |
| Computer Science | 3 | 2% |
| Engineering | 2 | 1% |
| Other | 8 | 6% |
| Unknown | 36 | 27% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 42. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 29 June 2023.
All research outputs
#972,295
of 25,382,360 outputs
Outputs from eLife
#3,071
of 15,548 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#16,566
of 284,952 outputs
Outputs of similar age from eLife
#73
of 327 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,382,360 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 96th percentile: it's in the top 5% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 15,548 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 36.1. This one has done well, scoring higher than 80% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 284,952 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 94% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 327 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done well, scoring higher than 77% of its contemporaries.