You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
X Demographics
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
| Title |
From Pathways Databases to Network Models of Switching Behavior
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
PLoS Computational Biology, September 2007
|
| DOI | 10.1371/journal.pcbi.0030152 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Baltazar D Aguda, Andrew B Goryachev |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profile of 1 X user who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Unknown | 1 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Members of the public | 1 | 100% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 98 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| United States | 9 | 9% |
| France | 3 | 3% |
| Brazil | 3 | 3% |
| United Kingdom | 2 | 2% |
| Germany | 2 | 2% |
| Netherlands | 1 | 1% |
| Turkey | 1 | 1% |
| Spain | 1 | 1% |
| Italy | 1 | 1% |
| Other | 0 | 0% |
| Unknown | 75 | 77% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Researcher | 36 | 37% |
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 14 | 14% |
| Other | 10 | 10% |
| Professor > Associate Professor | 9 | 9% |
| Student > Bachelor | 6 | 6% |
| Other | 20 | 20% |
| Unknown | 3 | 3% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 52 | 53% |
| Computer Science | 12 | 12% |
| Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology | 11 | 11% |
| Engineering | 4 | 4% |
| Medicine and Dentistry | 3 | 3% |
| Other | 10 | 10% |
| Unknown | 6 | 6% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 9. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 07 December 2014.
All research outputs
#4,195,528
of 25,394,764 outputs
Outputs from PLoS Computational Biology
#3,433
of 8,964 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#12,509
of 84,160 outputs
Outputs of similar age from PLoS Computational Biology
#10
of 32 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,394,764 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done well and is in the 83rd percentile: it's in the top 25% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 8,964 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 20.4. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 61% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 84,160 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 85% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 32 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 68% of its contemporaries.