↓ Skip to main content

New Insight into the Colonization Processes of Common Voles: Inferences from Molecular and Fossil Evidence

Overview of attention for article published in PLOS ONE, October 2008
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 25% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • Good Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (72nd percentile)
  • Above-average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (59th percentile)

Mentioned by

blogs
1 blog

Citations

dimensions_citation
56 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
92 Mendeley
citeulike
1 CiteULike
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
New Insight into the Colonization Processes of Common Voles: Inferences from Molecular and Fossil Evidence
Published in
PLOS ONE, October 2008
DOI 10.1371/journal.pone.0003532
Pubmed ID
Authors

Christelle Tougard, Elodie Renvoisé, Amélie Petitjean, Jean-Pierre Quéré

Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 92 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Portugal 2 2%
United States 2 2%
Chile 1 1%
France 1 1%
Italy 1 1%
Germany 1 1%
Czechia 1 1%
Israel 1 1%
Belgium 1 1%
Other 1 1%
Unknown 80 87%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Researcher 33 36%
Student > Ph. D. Student 18 20%
Student > Master 9 10%
Student > Doctoral Student 6 7%
Other 6 7%
Other 14 15%
Unknown 6 7%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 51 55%
Earth and Planetary Sciences 10 11%
Environmental Science 8 9%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 5 5%
Arts and Humanities 4 4%
Other 5 5%
Unknown 9 10%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 6. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 27 February 2009.
All research outputs
#5,383,270
of 22,705,019 outputs
Outputs from PLOS ONE
#65,433
of 193,828 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#25,225
of 91,638 outputs
Outputs of similar age from PLOS ONE
#154
of 378 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 22,705,019 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done well and is in the 76th percentile: it's in the top 25% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 193,828 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 15.0. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 66% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 91,638 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 72% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 378 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 59% of its contemporaries.