↓ Skip to main content

RNAi Screening in Drosophila Cells Identifies New Modifiers of Mutant Huntingtin Aggregation

Overview of attention for article published in PLOS ONE, September 2009
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Good Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (70th percentile)
  • Above-average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (58th percentile)

Mentioned by

blogs
1 blog

Citations

dimensions_citation
56 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
81 Mendeley
citeulike
1 CiteULike
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
RNAi Screening in Drosophila Cells Identifies New Modifiers of Mutant Huntingtin Aggregation
Published in
PLOS ONE, September 2009
DOI 10.1371/journal.pone.0007275
Pubmed ID
Authors

Joanna Doumanis, Koji Wada, Yoshihiro Kino, Adrian W. Moore, Nobuyuki Nukina

Abstract

The fruitfly Drosophila melanogaster is well established as a model system in the study of human neurodegenerative diseases. Utilizing RNAi, we have carried out a high-throughput screen for modifiers of aggregate formation in Drosophila larval CNS-derived cells expressing mutant human Huntingtin exon 1 fused to EGFP with an expanded polyglutamine repeat (62Q). 7200 genes, encompassing around 50% of the Drosophila genome, were screened, resulting in the identification of 404 candidates that either suppress or enhance aggregation. These candidates were subjected to secondary screening in normal length (18Q)-expressing cells and pruned to remove dsRNAs with greater than 10 off-target effects (OTEs). De novo RNAi probes were designed and synthesized for the remaining 68 candidates. Following a tertiary round of screening, 21 high confidence candidates were analyzed in vivo for their ability to modify mutant Huntingtin-induced eye degeneration and brain aggregation. We have established useful models for the study of human HD using the fly, and through our RNAi screen, we have identified new modifiers of mutant human Huntingtin aggregation and aggregate formation in the brain. Newly identified modifiers including genes related to nuclear transport, nucleotide processes, and signaling, may be involved in polyglutamine aggregate formation and Huntington disease cascades.

Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 81 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
China 4 5%
Finland 1 1%
Netherlands 1 1%
India 1 1%
United States 1 1%
Unknown 73 90%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Ph. D. Student 26 32%
Researcher 26 32%
Student > Bachelor 6 7%
Student > Master 5 6%
Student > Doctoral Student 3 4%
Other 9 11%
Unknown 6 7%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 54 67%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 10 12%
Neuroscience 6 7%
Medicine and Dentistry 3 4%
Materials Science 1 1%
Other 1 1%
Unknown 6 7%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 6. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 01 October 2009.
All research outputs
#5,717,514
of 22,705,019 outputs
Outputs from PLOS ONE
#69,384
of 193,828 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#26,363
of 92,798 outputs
Outputs of similar age from PLOS ONE
#211
of 513 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 22,705,019 research outputs across all sources so far. This one has received more attention than most of these and is in the 74th percentile.
So far Altmetric has tracked 193,828 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 15.0. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 63% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 92,798 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 70% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 513 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 58% of its contemporaries.