You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
| Title |
False negative rates in Drosophila cell-based RNAi screens: a case study
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
BMC Genomics, January 2011
|
| DOI | 10.1186/1471-2164-12-50 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Matthew Booker, Anastasia A Samsonova, Young Kwon, Ian Flockhart, Stephanie E Mohr, Norbert Perrimon |
| Abstract |
High-throughput screening using RNAi is a powerful gene discovery method but is often complicated by false positive and false negative results. Whereas false positive results associated with RNAi reagents has been a matter of extensive study, the issue of false negatives has received less attention. |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 90 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| United States | 5 | 6% |
| Germany | 2 | 2% |
| United Kingdom | 1 | 1% |
| China | 1 | 1% |
| Singapore | 1 | 1% |
| Unknown | 80 | 89% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Researcher | 26 | 29% |
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 19 | 21% |
| Professor | 9 | 10% |
| Student > Master | 7 | 8% |
| Professor > Associate Professor | 6 | 7% |
| Other | 11 | 12% |
| Unknown | 12 | 13% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 40 | 44% |
| Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology | 25 | 28% |
| Medicine and Dentistry | 5 | 6% |
| Engineering | 2 | 2% |
| Neuroscience | 2 | 2% |
| Other | 5 | 6% |
| Unknown | 11 | 12% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 9. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 21 October 2020.
All research outputs
#3,717,572
of 22,705,019 outputs
Outputs from BMC Genomics
#1,498
of 10,624 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#25,127
of 182,082 outputs
Outputs of similar age from BMC Genomics
#10
of 73 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 22,705,019 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done well and is in the 83rd percentile: it's in the top 25% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 10,624 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 4.7. This one has done well, scoring higher than 85% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 182,082 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 86% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 73 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done well, scoring higher than 86% of its contemporaries.