You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
Title |
Circulating and urinary microRNAs profile for predicting renal recovery from severe acute kidney injury
|
---|---|
Published in |
Journal of Intensive Care, September 2022
|
DOI | 10.1186/s40560-022-00637-0 |
Pubmed ID | |
Authors |
Thanawat Phulkerd, Tanat Lertussavavivat, Umaporn Limothai, Sadudee Peerapornratana, Win Kulvichit, Nuttha Lumlertgul, Kriang Tungsanga, Somchai Eiam-Ong, Yingyos Avihingsanon, Nattachai Srisawat |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 7 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
Country | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Unknown | 7 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Researcher | 2 | 29% |
Student > Ph. D. Student | 1 | 14% |
Lecturer | 1 | 14% |
Unknown | 3 | 43% |
Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Medicine and Dentistry | 3 | 43% |
Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 1 | 14% |
Unknown | 3 | 43% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 6. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 13 October 2022.
All research outputs
#5,954,479
of 23,515,383 outputs
Outputs from Journal of Intensive Care
#240
of 528 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#111,819
of 439,579 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Journal of Intensive Care
#8
of 9 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 23,515,383 research outputs across all sources so far. This one has received more attention than most of these and is in the 74th percentile.
So far Altmetric has tracked 528 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 12.1. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 52% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 439,579 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 74% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 9 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one.