↓ Skip to main content

A Neurosemantic Theory of Concrete Noun Representation Based on the Underlying Brain Codes

Overview of attention for article published in PLOS ONE, January 2010
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 5% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (97th percentile)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (91st percentile)

Mentioned by

news
1 news outlet
blogs
4 blogs
twitter
1 X user
patent
1 patent
googleplus
4 Google+ users

Citations

dimensions_citation
152 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
453 Mendeley
citeulike
8 CiteULike
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
A Neurosemantic Theory of Concrete Noun Representation Based on the Underlying Brain Codes
Published in
PLOS ONE, January 2010
DOI 10.1371/journal.pone.0008622
Pubmed ID
Authors

Marcel Adam Just, Vladimir L. Cherkassky, Sandesh Aryal, Tom M. Mitchell

Abstract

This article describes the discovery of a set of biologically-driven semantic dimensions underlying the neural representation of concrete nouns, and then demonstrates how a resulting theory of noun representation can be used to identify simple thoughts through their fMRI patterns. We use factor analysis of fMRI brain imaging data to reveal the biological representation of individual concrete nouns like apple, in the absence of any pictorial stimuli. From this analysis emerge three main semantic factors underpinning the neural representation of nouns naming physical objects, which we label manipulation, shelter, and eating. Each factor is neurally represented in 3-4 different brain locations that correspond to a cortical network that co-activates in non-linguistic tasks, such as tool use pantomime for the manipulation factor. Several converging methods, such as the use of behavioral ratings of word meaning and text corpus characteristics, provide independent evidence of the centrality of these factors to the representations. The factors are then used with machine learning classifier techniques to show that the fMRI-measured brain representation of an individual concrete noun like apple can be identified with good accuracy from among 60 candidate words, using only the fMRI activity in the 16 locations associated with these factors. To further demonstrate the generativity of the proposed account, a theory-based model is developed to predict the brain activation patterns for words to which the algorithm has not been previously exposed. The methods, findings, and theory constitute a new approach of using brain activity for understanding how object concepts are represented in the mind.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profile of 1 X user who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 453 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
United States 31 7%
United Kingdom 3 <1%
Italy 3 <1%
Malaysia 2 <1%
Germany 2 <1%
France 2 <1%
China 2 <1%
Japan 2 <1%
Spain 2 <1%
Other 18 4%
Unknown 386 85%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Researcher 117 26%
Student > Ph. D. Student 109 24%
Student > Master 38 8%
Professor 37 8%
Professor > Associate Professor 30 7%
Other 94 21%
Unknown 28 6%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Psychology 126 28%
Computer Science 65 14%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 50 11%
Neuroscience 47 10%
Linguistics 35 8%
Other 77 17%
Unknown 53 12%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 42. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 12 September 2023.
All research outputs
#927,509
of 24,453,338 outputs
Outputs from PLOS ONE
#12,267
of 211,103 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#3,558
of 172,596 outputs
Outputs of similar age from PLOS ONE
#56
of 632 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 24,453,338 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 96th percentile: it's in the top 5% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 211,103 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 15.6. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 94% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 172,596 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 97% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 632 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 91% of its contemporaries.